Deja moo
International Captain
It does, but no one else has had to be called twice in one month.Son Of Coco said:It goes for everyone, not just Harby.
It does, but no one else has had to be called twice in one month.Son Of Coco said:It goes for everyone, not just Harby.
Sir.Voltman said:Just call me Boutros Boutros-Ghali.
I think you can get ointment for that.Voltman said:Just call me Boutros Boutros-Ghali.
Looks more like Robbie Earle to me.username1234 said:you are the lady in the background behind samual jackson.
I guess you need to know that Shoaib was cleared to play only in ODIs( his ban for test matches was still there) because the delivery identiified by the ICC as 'chucked' or 'Illegal' happened to be 'bouncer' which is not allowed in ODIs.social said:So in response, Dalmiya lifts the ban on Shoaib. If this is true, he is no better than Richards.
http://content.cricinfo.com/australia/content/story/88787.htmlSanz said:I guess you need to know that Shoaib was cleared to play only in ODIs( his ban for test matches was still there) because the delivery identiified by the ICC as 'chucked' or 'Illegal' happened to be 'bouncer' which is not allowed in ODIs.
There is no comparison between Dalmiya and David Richards, Dalmiya banned Indian players whereas Richards sat on the report of Waugh & Warne. Dalmiya lifted the ban publicly, he didn't hide it from anyone, Richards concealed the report about LEE.
Apparently you forgot to highlight one more part , Dalmiya was not the only one to have applied it and perhaps he was the first one to use it for an Asian player and the moment this rule was used for a subcontinet player, it was revoked.Scallywag said:The ICC committee's powers to suspend players from international cricket, which had been applied several times over the past few years, were revoked by the ICC Executive Board in February after the then-ICC president Jagmohan Dalmiya overturned the committee's decision to suspend Pakistani fast bowler Shoaib Akhtar in December
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>.
SJS said:Q :Why subcontinental bowlers get picked for chucking
A :Simple. Because they chuck !
For the umpteenth time, grandpa, no delivery can be bowled without the presence of flexion at the elbowAnswer : Bull !! You mean to say, they are willing to "use" a delivery that just can not be bowled and willing to risk being called. That being the case, they do run the risk of their "bluff" being called.
Far be it from me to demure, but I thought after the study at the Champions Trophy Sarwan's delivery was uniquely declared to be as pure as the driven snow?C_C said:For the umpteenth time, grandpa, no delivery can be bowled without the presence of flexion at the elbow
Got it ? good. I know decades of holding a notion as gospel is hard to get rid of but please do try. Because those are the facts.
Anything else is pure, undaulterated rubbish.
Closest to 'driven snow' as it gets- a 1.5 degree deviation for Sarwan, which is just .5 over the margin of error in the measurements.Far be it from me to demure, but I thought after the study at the Champions Trophy Sarwan's delivery was uniquely declared to be as pure as the driven snow?
Ban the player.after post-mortem examination, an action is proven to be over the tolerance limit?