• Welcome to the Cricket Web forums, one of the biggest forums in the world dedicated to cricket.

    You are currently viewing our boards as a guest which gives you limited access to view most discussions and access our other features. By joining our free community you will have access to post topics, respond to polls, upload content and access many other special features. Registration is fast, simple and absolutely free so please, join the Cricket Web community today!

    If you have any problems with the registration process or your account login, please contact us.

Who's the greatest spinner of all time?

Who's the greatest spinner of all time?


  • Total voters
    23

honestbharani

Whatever it takes!!!
It was a bit of stretch to expect any CW discussion of spinners to be good, wasn't it. Even without Burgey coming into the thread and saying someone in particular's a chucker and some breed of bowlers is inferior, this discussion is still pretty dire.

Would still prefer it doesn't degenerate into ****** vs *****
It degenerated from the start.
I tried. :(


Are you doing ok L&L, you seem a bit snappy of late
Yeah, hope everything is fine @Line and Length
 

a massive zebra

International Captain
kumble is by some distance inferior to both jadeja and ashwin.
DRS makes a big difference to spinners and both Ashwin and Jadeja have benefited from this whilst Kumble did not. Ashwin and Jadeja also bowl in a much better bowling lineup. Statistical experts like Charles Davis have proved that bowling averages improve when playing in a stronger attack. Despite all this, Kumble's home record holds up relatively well against Ashwin and Jadeja.
 

Lillian Thomson

Hall of Fame Member
The change caused by DRS isn't so much about changing decisions as changing the batsman's technique. Pre DRS batsman could safely get a big stride in and (Darrell Hair not withstanding) there would be too much doubt for the umpire to give them out LBW. With DRS they have to play more with the bat when on the defensive, which is a greater risk. Of course it's impossible to quantify or prove in stats guru.
 

Migara

Cricketer Of The Year
absolute myth IMO. DRS would change just as many against them as it would for them
Not necessarily. lot of front foot LBWs are given now. However would not mattered with Kumble, because he was a "pitch middle, hit middle" type of bowler.
 

Migara

Cricketer Of The Year
The change caused by DRS isn't so much about changing decisions as changing the batsman's technique. Pre DRS batsman could safely get a big stride in and (Darrell Hair not withstanding) there would be too much doubt for the umpire to give them out LBW. With DRS they have to play more with the bat when on the defensive, which is a greater risk. Of course it's impossible to quantify or prove in stats guru.
None of them hold true against Kumble. You rarely can leve him because everything is pitching on stumps, and cannot leave, because majority is hitting the stumps. LBWs would have been very straightforward with him. Batspads could go either way.
 

jayjay

U19 Cricketer
Murali, Warne....and everyone else.

No one really lives up to those 2 and you can rank them either way but for me Muralia is numero uno across formats of obviously greater than Warne.
 

Top