Its almost 90 years, and no. Yes if you count past 3-4 decades. Considering other teams were already well established when India started playing, no one expected them to win much early. I have been watching cricket since 2007 only and have seen India mostly win . And pretty much convinced this will continue in future as well with few ups and downs .Does India have more wins than losses in their 70 year history?
Will try. No, the Rank indication is for India reaching rank 1 in that particular season, and not necessarily ending the season with rank 1.That's a nice graph. I'd like to see one for Australia if you can bothered. Not to hammer home "Australia blaa blaa blaa" but just to see if those steep cliffs of the Indian one are abnormal. Do the peaks coincide with runs of home tests? How is India No1 in 95/96. Wasn't that when the baton for No1 passed from West Indies dynasty to Australia's developing dynasty. What was India doing then that has them in the game?
You are so salty. Grow up suckerMuch like today then.
I don't think there is much growing up left for Burgey to do tbhYou are so salty. Grow up sucker
What? Are you trying to say that bullets are NOT worse than admiration?At first I thought Burgey was trolling but now I'm concerned that he thinks he may actually be correct about this, even those he is so plainly wrong.
Could you explain why he is wrong, point by point. Because from an unbiased point of view, it seems like Tendulkar was a hack.At first I thought Burgey was trolling but now I'm concerned that he thinks he may actually be correct about this, even those he is so plainly wrong.
How could you even compare the two to begin with? It's not the same kind of pressure. I wouldn't even call the bullets thing 'pressure', it's fear. It's living life in fear and trying to overcome that.What? Are you trying to say that bullets are NOT worse than admiration?