• Welcome to the Cricket Web forums, one of the biggest forums in the world dedicated to cricket.

    You are currently viewing our boards as a guest which gives you limited access to view most discussions and access our other features. By joining our free community you will have access to post topics, respond to polls, upload content and access many other special features. Registration is fast, simple and absolutely free so please, join the Cricket Web community today!

    If you have any problems with the registration process or your account login, please contact us.

On Mike Hussey...

fredfertang

Cricket Web: All-Time Legend
My confession about Mike Hussey is that I am far more bothered than any grown man should be by the fact that his Test average is still around 70 . Every time I watch him bat I hope he fails simply so that the average may descend rapidly to the low 50s where I feel it belongs. I know that this is wrong by the way.
I know the feeling Mr Z - it's not that I am worried about him taking over from Gary Sobers/Graeme Pollock as the second best left handed batsman in history, though that's a concern, but he seems able to challenge Graeme Fowler for the number one slot too ...................

............. and if he's not enough of a worry there's that bloody brother of his as well - if both of them fire next year then even with the mighty Harmy/Fred/Burnley Express combo fit and firing we may well be shafted. I do remain hopeful the Aussie selectors are daft enough to leave junior out but I'd be happier with that thought if Hayden could manage a few more runs against India
 

Richard

Cricket Web Staff Member
Can't help but be rather more worried by all of Jaques, Ponting, Hussey Snr., Clarke, Katich and heck, even Hodge, than Hussey Jnr. TBH.

Hussey Jnr. is at least, I think we can say, of more danger to us than Symonds (presuming Umpires give him out when he's out) though.
 

pup11

International Coach
Another tick.

Averaged 56 for the Tests
Averaged 74 for the tour.
He is an android from the future, so this really shouldn't come as a surprise to anyone, and on the contrary i think his series average was pretty low by his standards, no wonder Australia lost the series...:ph34r:
 

Precambrian

Banned
Chennai players are class. I'm not surprised tbh.
Good one.

Hussey was superb in his own fashion. He never attracts "ooh, aah" kind of admiration at his strokes, but quietly collects his runs. Even though his SR is a bit low, I;ll take it for the solidity he gives to Australia. None of his dismissals were off bad balls, and it took a ripper from Mishy to get him out at Nagpur,
 

NUFAN

Y no Afghanistan flag
Just on Mike Hussey...

Hussey's impact on games..
W 21 matches - ave 78.74
L 3 matches - ave 35.00
D 5 matches - ave 47.87
 

Ikki

Hall of Fame Member
Good one.

Hussey was superb in his own fashion. He never attracts "ooh, aah" kind of admiration at his strokes, but quietly collects his runs. Even though his SR is a bit low, I;ll take it for the solidity he gives to Australia. None of his dismissals were off bad balls, and it took a ripper from Mishy to get him out at Nagpur,
His SR is 50+ how is that low?
 

krkode

State Captain
I too have followed Hussey's career stats for a couple of years now and have patiently been waiting, so to speak, for it to plateau into something more "normal" i.e. mid-50s. But he just keeps going on and on. :dry:

I think he's an awesome batsman, I'd say Australia's second-best, even if he isn't as dominant as Hayden. He may not have the destroying qualities of Hayden or Ponting but he has that quality which is just as annoying of just hanging around and not being easy to dismiss. And because of that, the runs just come. If I had to make a comparison, I'd compare him to Dravid, who despite having averaged more than Tendulkar for good chunks of his career, has still been overshadowed by him.

Part of why Hussey hasn't been recognized as much as Tendulkar or Ponting or Lara have in the last decade, I feel, has to do with him having entered the Aussie team when it was at its peak. By then, everyone was just expecting Australia to roll over everyone, and that's kind of what he did. In as such, his over all impact on Australian cricket has probably not, and probably never will be, as great as Tendulkar's or Lara's impact in their respective countries. i.e. Would Australia still have been #1 for the past 5 years if they didn't have Hussey - very likely.

It's not a fair comparison, but I feel like it is something that will diminish Hussey's overall impact in the grand scheme of things and that is how his career has come to be judged.
Still, given Dravid's recent run of form, if I had to pick a batsman to bat for my life, it'd probably be Hussey!
 

Richard

Cricket Web Staff Member
Just on Mike Hussey...

Hussey's impact on games..
W 21 matches - ave 78.74
L 3 matches - ave 35.00
D 5 matches - ave 47.87
Pah, he's clearly useless - completely loses it when his team are going down and scores very poorly when it comes to cashing-in on flat draw-foregone-conclusion decks. :dry:

Nope, Bradman Mk2 he ain't.
 

G.I.Joe

International Coach
I have to disagree. He's definitely undergoing a correction. Average of 46 and a strike rate of 44 (which is why many people aren't far off the mark wrt finding him a slow batsman) over the last 10 games, 2 centuries in the last 10 games as opposed to 8 off the first 19 tests. He will do well enough to not let his figures go into a freefall (well enough to remain worldwide top 5 even) , but I don't imagine he'll go back to being the superman he was.

 
Last edited:

Precambrian

Banned
The main reason he'll never be probably mentioned like the Lara or Tendulkar, is due to his sheer attritional play. More like Dravid. Hangs in there for dear life, and quietly makes his runs while some other guy is going bang-bang at the other end. Nobody notices or tries to get him out, because he is damn difficult to get out, as he plays very less risk game. As such, his SR is not impressive given modern day flat tracks.

But damn, I'd give any number of Gambhirs to get one Hussey.
 

Anil

Hall of Fame Member
he is definitely the best batsman currently...all-time standing remains to be seen since he started very late in international cricket and he has to prove his durability and consistency over a few more seasons but there is no doubt he is headed in the right direction...
 

Top_Cat

Request Your Custom Title Now!
The main reason he'll never be probably mentioned like the Lara or Tendulkar, is due to his sheer attritional play. More like Dravid. Hangs in there for dear life, and quietly makes his runs while some other guy is going bang-bang at the other end. Nobody notices or tries to get him out, because he is damn difficult to get out, as he plays very less risk game. As such, his SR is not impressive given modern day flat tracks.

But damn, I'd give any number of Gambhirs to get one Hussey.
In the early days of his Test career, though, there were a few knocks where he'd play as per normal but when batting with the tail, go for it and spank the bowlers to all parts, a la Adelaide against South Africa a couple of years ago. He can do it but I think the changing nature of the team and its success has checked this sort of batting somewhat.

I have to disagree. He's definitely undergoing a correction. Average of 46 and a strike rate of 44 (which is why many people aren't far off the mark wrt finding him a slow batsman) over the last 10 games, 2 centuries in the last 10 games as opposed to 8 off the first 19 tests. He will do well enough to not let his figures go into a freefall (well enough to remain worldwide top 5 even) , but I don't imagine he'll go back to being the superman he was.

Most batsmen have a plateau after a good start, though (he could only go down, really). The best figure it out again and start a new run so Hussey may well dominate again. I don't think he's going to do the slow decline just yet. Seems to be batting just fine.
 

pup11

International Coach
The main reason he'll never be probably mentioned like the Lara or Tendulkar, is due to his sheer attritional play. More like Dravid. Hangs in there for dear life, and quietly makes his runs while some other guy is going bang-bang at the other end. Nobody notices or tries to get him out, because he is damn difficult to get out, as he plays very less risk game. As such, his SR is not impressive given modern day flat tracks.

But damn, I'd give any number of Gambhirs to get one Hussey.
Hussey for me is an exceptional player and the way he bats gives every Aussie fan such a sense of calm even in the most direst situation, i think there is common perception that Hussey is a slow grinding batsman, but i don't think that's entirely true, with so many attacking batsmen right through the Aussie batting line-up i think Hussey just plays the sheet-anchor role where he makes his runs with minimal fuss and while from the other end the other batsmen score aggressively, but its not like he can't shift gears whenever required and score quickly.
 

Top