• Welcome to the Cricket Web forums, one of the biggest forums in the world dedicated to cricket.

    You are currently viewing our boards as a guest which gives you limited access to view most discussions and access our other features. By joining our free community you will have access to post topics, respond to polls, upload content and access many other special features. Registration is fast, simple and absolutely free so please, join the Cricket Web community today!

    If you have any problems with the registration process or your account login, please contact us.

***Official*** Australia in England (The Ashes)

SpaceMonkey

International Debutant
To be fair he wont be the first or last player to not read Shane Warne that well, if thats the bar for being 'clueless' then most batsmen will be in that grouping too.
At least he's keeping 1 end blocked up so Vaughan can score freely at the other end without worrying about the side losing wickets.
 

Majin

International Debutant
SpaceMonkey said:
To be fair he wont be the first or last player to not read Shane Warne that well, if thats the bar for being 'clueless' then most batsmen will be in that grouping too.
At least he's keeping 1 end blocked up so Vaughan can score freely at the other end without worrying about the side losing wickets.
I'm sure collingwood could do that, and then we'd get a stupidly good fielder out of it as well.
 

FaaipDeOiad

Hall of Fame Member
That's why part-timers get wickets. Important little period here, new ball due shortly, England need to hold and not lose a couple of quick ones. Australia could still come out of this looking respectable, which really they shouldn't given the platform.
 

Slow Love™

International Captain
Interesting innings from Vaughan - absolutely shocker of a ball to get out to, but that's so often the way it happens on a day like this.

I tend to agree with social though, that in between the drops, he looked extremely good.
 

social

Request Your Custom Title Now!
At least they're dropping one and catching one now.

Top innings by Vaughan although Richard wouldnt think so.
 

FaaipDeOiad

Hall of Fame Member
Isolator said:
Why did Bowden dead-ball that? Does he not know the rules of cricket?
Haha yeah, that was a weird one wasn't it? He edged the ball, Hayden took it on the bounce... dead ball? :wacko:
 

SpaceMonkey

International Debutant
Majin said:
I'm sure collingwood could do that, and then we'd get a stupidly good fielder out of it as well.
The same reason why Australia persisted with Clarke when he wasnt scoring. Bell is young, obviously has skill and is going to be the future of the Test team if he can settle into International cricket. A few dodgy test innings against a team with the 2 best bowlers of the generation shouldnt be enough for him to be dropped tbh.

No matter how bad he looks he's still there. More than can be said for many english batsmen in the past when they've struggled.
 

Isolator

State 12th Man
FaaipDeOiad said:
Haha yeah, that was a weird one wasn't it? He edged the ball, Hayden took it on the bounce... dead ball? :wacko:
It sometimes seems like umpires aren't as well-versed in the rules as they should be. Every now and then you'll see something similar - a completely bizarre decision, mostly insignificant, but still worrying. For example, take how umpires are supposed to keep an arm out until the batsman is prepared to face the ball. They're supposed to do it every ball, but you rarely see it happen. When South Africa were last in NZ, there was a mix-up (Pollock bowling Styris, who was unprepared) that could who been disastrous, and all because the ump didn't check whether the batsman was ready...
 

FaaipDeOiad

Hall of Fame Member
Pietersen still looks to me like he has real problems playing away from the body on the off-side. He's certainly done okay with it so far, but it doesn't look particularly good and it might be possible to exploit it.
 

nick-o

First Class Debutant
nick-o said:
I'd love to know when last an Aussie attack featuring both McGrath and Warne looked at a scoreboard reading 200-2.

Great knock here.
Just to update this: I'd love to know when last an Aussie attack featuring both McGrath and Warne looked at a scoreboard reading 300-3.
 
nick-o said:
Just to update this: I'd love to know when last an Aussie attack featuring both McGrath and Warne looked at a scoreboard reading 300-3.
Never I doubt.

I can't see how any other team has managed to get this much luck in the history of cricket, let alone just Warne/Mcgrath matches.
 

Top