Dick Rockett
International Vice-Captain
Some have made the point that the effect of T20 is that batsmen have become more innovative. More canny. Better skilled. The bowlers should adapt or die.
But T20 doesn't operate without bowlers, and it's not like they're are standing there saying "well, there is literally no way to counter this assault so I'll just cop it." Of course they're trying to adapt. If batsmen are getting ahead and bowlers are being left behind, surely that indicates an inherent advantage for batsmen?
At any rate, I think it's funny how the solutions in this thread seem to run along the same lines as your traditional left vs right political argument.
But T20 doesn't operate without bowlers, and it's not like they're are standing there saying "well, there is literally no way to counter this assault so I'll just cop it." Of course they're trying to adapt. If batsmen are getting ahead and bowlers are being left behind, surely that indicates an inherent advantage for batsmen?
At any rate, I think it's funny how the solutions in this thread seem to run along the same lines as your traditional left vs right political argument.
Last edited: