Yeah, because you know it NEVER rains in England. No siree.Never. That country DOES NOT have a reputation for being rainy. I mean it's not like rain HAD any impact at that wonderful, perfect tournament in that country last year. So let's only have tournaments in countries not known for being rainy because it's not like South Africa is known for rain either. Nope. Not all.Yeah there's bad luck involved but these competitions get planned months in advance and there's an obvious risk that Guyana in the rainy season is likely to be, well, rainy
Don't think that'll change anything. Playing on matting in kicks would actually be more hazardous for the bowlers than playing on turf in spikes. This is aside from how the ball will behave, etc.As I posted in the other thread T20 matches should be played on artificial pitches allowing the game to continue during rain. It would be exciting to watch a match played in pouring rain
Ha really. Unless it's Womens T20i.Don't think that'll change anything. Playing on matting in kicks would actually be more hazardous for the bowlers than playing on turf in spikes. This is aside from how the ball will behave, etc.
His point was that logically the tournament could have been scheduled at a time of the year when it's not extremely likely to rain in Guyana. You might have noticed that if you hadn't been spending your time being snide instead.Yeah, because you know it NEVER rains in England. No siree.Never. That country DOES NOT have a reputation for being rainy. I mean it's not like rain HAD any impact at that wonderful, perfect tournament in that country last year. So let's only have tournaments in countries not known for being rainy because it's not like South Africa is known for rain either. Nope. Not all.
So they should not conduct any ICC events in England during summer because it's known to be fairly rainy?His point was that logically the tournament could have been scheduled at a time of the year when it's not extremely likely to rain in Guyana. You might have noticed that if you hadn't been spending your time being snide instead.
There's a difference between a spot of rain here and there, and a full-on rainy season though.So they should not conduct any ICC events in England during summer because it's known to be fairly rainy?![]()
Yeah, because you know it NEVER rains in England. No siree.Never. That country DOES NOT have a reputation for being rainy. I mean it's not like rain HAD any impact at that wonderful, perfect tournament in that country last year. So let's only have tournaments in countries not known for being rainy because it's not like South Africa is known for rain either. Nope. Not all.
Well done, you've both jointly won the 'missing the point' award for this week!So they should not conduct any ICC events in England during summer because it's known to be fairly rainy?![]()
I would add that if for whatever reason you do decide to play cricket in the rainiest country in world cricket in the wet season, it might be a decent idea to allow an extra day in case it rains. They didn't do so, and this particular group of matches has been ruined as a result. It just seems such a waste, and so harsh on Ireland (where, before you perceptively point it out maxtop and Sir Alex, I'm aware it does also rain).Well done, you've both jointly won the 'missing the point' award for this week!
Yes, it rains in England a bit in summer. But we don't hold World Cups in october, last I checked, and that would be the equivalent argument.
I agree it is harsh. But no more harsh than what happened to England in last years cup.I would add that if for whatever reason you do decide to play cricket in the rainiest country in world cricket in the wet season, it might be a decent idea to allow an extra day in case it rains. They didn't do so, and this particular group of matches has been ruined as a result. It just seems such a waste, and so harsh on Ireland (where, before you perceptively point it out maxtop and Sir Alex, I'm aware it does also rain).
February?The point is suggest another time to hold the cup then, because afaic, even the lesser months get more precipitation than what England gets in their wettest months.
Impossible considering One Day World Cup starts Feb last.February?
I don't see the relevance of the England comparison. Whether a tournament is being held in England or elsewhere it seems to me to make sense to schedule it when the weather tends to be best suited to cricket. It's about minimising the risk of games being ruined by the weather.
And had you been paying attention there was a drought in Guyana that lasted UNTIL the cricket actually started. It rains In Guyana. Not news. Just as it does in Engalnd and just as it did in last year's T20. England is also a rainy country regardless of whatever you might wish to say. So if there should be no T20s in Guyana in the rainy season which can be whebeer, the same rukles should apply to England. Get it?His point was that logically the tournament could have been scheduled at a time of the year when it's not extremely likely to rain in Guyana. You might have noticed that if you hadn't been spending your time being snide instead.
I doubt they were aware of the drought when they scheduled the tournament.And had you been paying attention there was a drought in Guyana that lasted UNTIL the cricket actually started. It rains In Guyana. Not news. Just as it does in Engalnd and just as it did in last year's T20. England is also a rainy country regardless of whatever you might wish to say. So if there should be no T20s in Guyana in the rainy season which can be whebeer, the same rukles should apply to England. Get it?
It occurs to me that - gasp - perhaps they're playing too many limited overs tournaments, and ridiculous scheduling is a natural consequence. The last World T20 was less than a year ago FFS, and we've only just finished the IPL.Impossible considering One Day World Cup starts Feb last.
No, because it's not a valid comparison.And had you been paying attention there was a drought in Guyana that lasted UNTIL the cricket actually started. It rains In Guyana. Not news. Just as it does in Engalnd and just as it did in last year's T20. England is also a rainy country regardless of whatever you might wish to say. So if there should be no T20s in Guyana in the rainy season which can be whebeer, the same rukles should apply to England. Get it?