NZTailender
I can't believe I ate the whole thing
Biomechanics served us well during the the late 90s and early-mid 2000s iirc
The Aussies are just playing them better.What's happened to these guys? Is it because of their injuries? Have the balls changed?
A couple of years ago both Southee and Boult would swing the ball prodigiously. They don't do this any more. Not even in NZ conditions.
Watch these highlights:
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=xJW0OgK7obQ
Only wish they could bowl like this again.
probably because they didn't have a ****ing clue what they were doingBiomechanics served us well during the the late 90s and early-mid 2000s iirc
I'd question the first part of the sentence.I get the feeling a lot of bowling coaches while great in terms of tactics and mindset aren't that qualified in terms of biomechanics.
well with boult and southee their actions are both biomechanically pretty poor - both bowl around their front leg and have weak chest drive. Need some ian pont imoBowling is such a difficult thing to coach because everyone's action is different. There are so many moving parts, so many little things that all add up into building rhythm. As an outside party, you need to completely understand someone elses action before you can begin to comment on what is going wrong. And that's hard, because you don't have the muscle memory in you. You aren't the one running in to bowl. You can't feel the rhythm or lack thereof. You can only watch from the outside and attempt to understand and internalize it. And even then you're probably going to miss some things.
Bowlers themselves are best positioned to understand their own actions, and are the best person to diagnose it and make the necessary tweaks. All a coach can do is just facilitate it - filming them in the nets, compiling past footage and comparing it, offering advice, suggesting ways to go about understanding whats wrong, and being there with them in the nets as they bowl and attempt to resolve the mistakes.
I'd be a lot more concerned about a coach who attempts to 'fix' a bowler after only a couple of months around the team. Its hard enough to understand one bowlers' mechanics, let alone an entire squads. And unless they really, truly understand the action, they're probably going to do more harm than good by attempting to tweak it.
'Bio-mechanically poor' is a bit of a misnomer. You probably mean that in terms of injury prevention or optimising how much energy they transfer from their runup into the ball. But this overlooks the fact that their bowling actions have developed over years and years of practice and refinement. It may not be what's optimal for the average person, but it is optimal for them and their body. It's what works for them, and that's what matters.well with boult and southee their actions are both biomechanically pretty poor - both bowl around their front leg and have weak chest drive. Need some ian pont imo
this is all any reasonable bio-mechanics coach will advocate anyway. Pont works at making very small changes and getting them to stick. He worked with Steyn to fix his angled run up just before he went super-sayan'Bio-mechanically poor' is a bit of a misnomer. You probably mean that in terms of injury prevention or optimising how much energy they transfer from their runup into the ball. But this overlooks the fact that their bowling actions have developed over years and years of practice and refinement. It may not be what's optimal for the average person, but it is optimal for them and their body. It's what works for them, and that's what matters.
At this stage in their careers, any tweaks will just force them to re-learn years and years of muscle-,memory, and require them to engage parts of their body that may not be up to the handling the stresses of an international bowling workload. An Ian Point-style intervention could just seem them struggle with rhythm and break down with injury for a while before it all clicks and comes together again.
They both have had quite a bit of success already, and neither of their actions seems complex or hard to reproduce. I think it would suit them better to take some time off, watch some old footage and current footage, and do some work in the nets to fix the tiny flaws and bad habits that have creeped in.
'Bio-mechanically poor' is a bit of a misnomer. You probably mean that in terms of injury prevention or optimising how much energy they transfer from their runup into the ball. But this overlooks the fact that their bowling actions have developed over years and years of practice and refinement. It may not be what's optimal for the average person, but it is optimal for them and their body. It's what works for them, and that's what matters.
At this stage in their careers, any tweaks will just force them to re-learn years and years of muscle-,memory, and require them to engage parts of their body that may not be up to the handling the stresses of an international bowling workload. An Ian Point-style intervention could just seem them struggle with rhythm and break down with injury for a while before it all clicks and comes together again.
They both have had quite a bit of success already, and neither of their actions seems complex or hard to reproduce. I think it would suit them better to take some time off, watch some old footage and current footage, and do some work in the nets to fix the tiny flaws and bad habits that have creeped in.