nightprowler10
Global Moderator
I say let the one-sided battles run at least 12 hours. It takes the fun out of battles when they go too fast as some of them did in the battle of the subcontinent.
With no seedings though, let's just hope we don't end up with Sobers v Viv/Marshall in the first round!nightprowler10 said:
At times like this, I usually switched things around a bit in the battle of the Aussies. Pretty sure I had McGrath vs Miller in the first round, I switched things around a bit and ended having that same battle as the grand final. Don't think too many people will complain of that outcome.The Sean said:With no seedings though, let's just hope we don't end up with Sobers v Viv/Marshall in the first round!
I don't agree with that, what if 7 people who like Dave Mohammad vote for him within an hour over Marshall? I think letting it run 12 hours is a better option.PhoenixFire said:Yeah, I knew before that battle had started that Croft was going to win, but anyhow. When someone becomes 7-0 up, I will call it quits.
I'll just use common sense on these ones. On ones olike this, it's clear that Croft is going to win it, but I'll let other go on for longer if there seems to be more open about it.nightprowler10 said:I don't agree with that, what if 7 people who like Dave Mohammad vote for him within an hour over Marshall? I think letting it run 12 hours is a better option.
PhoenixFire said:Personaly, I'd be tempted to vote Viv Richards over Sobers.
damn! gus logie was a huge miss!Goughy said:Hmm, missed nominating players.
Surprised that Charlie Davis didnt get a mention.
Id also have had Logie in for his decent batting and great fielding
and John Shepherd was a good cricketer, short test career but Wisden Cricketer of the Year 1979.
Oh well, Id have 'em in, especially given the average nature of a few included.