As Trundler said, Bob Simpson is ineligible as he's an opener averaging > 45.Bob Simpson.
Both my picks so far could be overturned based on the all-rounder criteria...
Does Tate qualify with a batting average of 25.5? Interestingly he bowled both medium fast (where he qualifies) and off spin (where he wouldn't). I see him as a medium fast who was a useful bat but not an all-rounder. Simpson is a different story. 70 of his 111 innings were as an opener where he doesn't qualify (batting average exceeds 45). When not opening he averaged 31.7 and could be used as an allrounder.Bob Simpson.
Both my picks so far could be overturned based on the all-rounder criteria...
I felt there was a theme to your selections but couldn't figure it out...then it hit me, with Al Hasan, Flintoff and Watson you are only selecting Test CaptainsShane Watson
Regarding (4), I think the point of Shri was that there is no draft order as such. You can make your pick 24 hours after you have made your last pick. That is simple enough IMO and something that is new, so worth trying out.What do we do when the OP draft manager seems to have done a runner and is not providing draft direction? I provide my suggestions to the outstanding issues.
(1) is Worrell an Allrounder therefore disqualified as bat > 40?
- the only purpose of the criteria is to stop ATG's being picked. Who would pick Worrell as an ATG allrounder? I suggest no-one so does that make him an ATG bat, no as he averages <50 which was the agreed cut-off criteria. Suggest leave him in as a batsman that bowls a bit.
(2) is Maurice Tate disqualified as an allrounder because bowling < 30, even his cricinfo player role says allrounder?
- no, same reason as above, any allrounder averaging high 20's in both bowling and batting wouldn't make an ATG side, so perfect for ATVG side. Suggest leave him in as a bowler that bats a bit.
(3) is Bob Simpson disqualified as opener requires < 45 batting average
- yes, clearly against the rules of <45 for an opener.
(4) is selection 24 hours from last post, or 24 hour intervals from first post.
- surely it's 24 hours from last post, which would allow people to move up in the draft order when others don't post on time.
Just my opinion for Shri to agree or disagree if he comes back. Please note that a decision on Worrell should be made immediately imo as Gooch is now not available to other drafters while waiting for a decision on Worrell. Unfair for those wanting him.
I love the 24 hour rule and probably the only reason I joined this draft, however it only makes sense if it's from last post (snooze you lose). Line and Length asked if timing was from original post only so 24 hours didn't matter after first post.Regarding (4), I think the point of Shri was that there is no draft order as such. You can make your pick 24 hours after you have made your last pick. That is simple enough IMO and something that is new, so worth trying out.