subshakerz
Cricket Web: All-Time Legend
How many can claim to be a worldclass bowler along with a top 6 good bat? Surely pro rata he is more than an ATG bowler.Not sure about Keith Miller
How many can claim to be a worldclass bowler along with a top 6 good bat? Surely pro rata he is more than an ATG bowler.Not sure about Keith Miller
Bradman > Sobers or ImranNot even Bradman in the case of Sobers and Imran.
Regardless if Pakistan can't complain, they were one umpiring decision away from a 2-0 win in WI.eh, a very much fading one, the team at Bourda were missing both their alpha batsman (Viv) and their alpha bowler, Philip Simmons was one of the openers but he was bad, Hooper and Logie we all know, Greenidge was very much fading by that time, only really left Haynes and Richardson combined with Walsh as the only experienced good bowler, Ambrose was debuting and was awful that series. Barbados was impressive but not really a tactical masterstroke by him.
also, Pakistan can't complain about bad umpiring lol.
What does that even mean? You don't think NZ needed Hadlee?Still needs the guy, and his stood up more often than most.
ToughRegardless if Pakistan can't complain, they were one umpiring decision away from a 2-0 win in WI.
I agree but getting them that close is to Imrans credit.Tough
I think Migara doesn't like the idea of an Australian being the greatest cricketer of all time.I agree but getting them that close is to Imrans credit.
But Bradman is still better.
@Migara is a maverick.I think Migara doesn't like the idea of an Australian being the greatest cricketer of all time.
We need the occasional non-conformist to keep things interesting.Kapil Dev>Viv Richards, Clive Lloyd and Alvin Kalicharan lives in my heart forever.
That was epic iclKapil Dev>Viv Richards, Clive Lloyd and Alvin Kalicharan lives in my heart forever.
Nah its Brown.It's wrong to give credit to players who made their teams stronger?
Seriously?
I swear this is just a cricket thing.
Brady is the GOAT because of wins, as was Montanna before him.
Pitchers gets credit for wins and losses based on their importance.
McGrath elevated that team to practically GOAT status and without him, they simply aren't.
Yes, one gets credit for that.
Tell that to a 4 prong WI seam attack. If Bradman was there they will find extra yard to intimidate him (successfully or unsuccessfully). The truth is there had been many better attacks than what Bradman played as his best.Bradman > Sobers or Imran
Just having the mere presence of Don Bradman would demoralise the bowlers in the opposition team
Then I pick Gilchrist in best ever five cricketers post Bradman, and McGrath almost equal to Marshall. Now explain that. Only Aussie players I have a dig at is Lillee and Warne. Having dig at them hurts the masculine animals inside Aussies.I think Migara doesn't like the idea of an Australian being the greatest cricketer of all time.
Ask Sobers to bat in Bodyline.Tell that to a 4 prong WI seam attack. If Bradman was there they will find extra yard to intimidate him (successfully or unsuccessfully). The truth is there had been many better attacks than what Bradman played as his best.
Anderson a surprising pick thereFlintoff
Root
Anderson
Stokes
Afridi
And I strenuously disagree.He isn't. Realistically after Bradman, the top cricketers should all be top ARs (Sobers, Imran, Hadlee, Kallis, Miller). Nobody can overcome them on primary alone
Exactly.Hammond is that tier, better bat than Kallis, GOAT slip, handy paceman recognised for his skill by everyone including the Don, good at Googlies and Leg Breaks