Umpiring Errors

[Cevno]

if this did happen, then said batsman should never play in the next ie under 20 or 21 world cup. for not knowing which side of his bat to use.

His bat came late on to the ball ,hence taking the angle on the back of the bat with big inswing. Sachin hit one of Murali sweeping of the back of the bat in srilanka pretty hard and then when it was reviewed and given out he was very surprised. Still trying to figure out though, what it has to do with the Morgan dismissal?

 

[Spark]

Pretty sure a batsman got bowled in a u19 world cup game from a video i was watching a few days earlier with the ball ricochetting from the back of the bat. A big inswinger it was. Am on my phone right now,will find the link later and more. In any case it has nothing to do with the Morgan dismissal.....

Ricocheting playing across the line of the ball is a completely different matter to pushing fowards as KP was. Seriously it is not physically possible unless your bat is facing sideways or backwards. In which case hang on's comment is bang-on.

 

[hang on]

His bat came late on to the ball ,hence taking the angle on the back of the bat with big inswing. Sachin hit one of Murali sweeping of the back of the bat in srilanka pretty hard and then when it was reviewed and given out he was very surprised. Still trying to figure out though, what it has to do with the Morgan dismissal?

i thought i was about playing foward defensive. i was also being facetious!

 

[Cevno]

So you want to debate Morgan or KP? I was talking about batsman in general,with regards to Morgan walking and you bring something else up?

 

[Dan]

I can tell you of at least several occasions, some involving me, some others, where the batsmen didn't feel what seemed like an obvious nick.

AWTA.

I had at least 3 of them last season.

 

[hang on]

So you want to debate Morgan or KP? I was talking about batsman in general,with regards to Morgan walking and you bring something else up?

i was just wondering about your response to spark's query about a single occasion when a batsman has had the ball brush the back of the bat when playing forward. at least that was the initial question to which u gave the under 19 wc example.

 

[Cevno]

i was just wondering about your response to spark's query about a single occasion when a batsman has had the ball brush the back of the bat when playing forward. at least that was the initial question to which u gave the under 19 wc example.

That was intended at Spark. in any case can't really talk about it more on my phone.

 

[hang on]

That was intended at Spark. in any case can't really talk about it more on my phone.

oops. sorry.

 

[KiWiNiNjA]

BTW on topic a plumb lbw (according to Hawkeye, and commentators) of Swann off a Harby delivery was not given.

Hawkeye can not be trusted!

 

[Furball]

BTW on topic a plumb lbw (according to Hawkeye, and commentators) of Swann off a Harby delivery was not given.

Seriously comical stuff from guys who're arguing technology (which proved horse**** whether it was out or not) should be considered over the umpire's and victim's words.

Which is it? You can't have your cake and eat it when it comes to HawkEye - you've been one of its biggest critics so you can't all of a sudden turn round and trust the technology just because it shows India were harshly done by.

 

[Cevno]

It can be trusted for clear shockers, but not for marginal calls. Besides i thought we were supposed to follow the balltracking blindly despite what one maker was saying

 

[Furball]

Anyone seen my goalposts? Some **** keeps moving them.

 

[Cevno]

Anyone seen my goalposts? Some **** keeps moving them.

Find one post where i said anything different and then come back and make sense. Besides that point works both ways and you can't have the cake and it eat it too for different teams after trusting the hawkeye more than your life. And in any case it wasn't even required in this case.

 

[hang on]

Find one post where i said anything different and then come back and make sense. Besides that point works both ways and you can't have the cake and it eat it too for different teams after trusting the hawkeye more than your life. And in any case it wasn't even required in this case.

don't want to get involved in this one or take sides but the card in me says that u missed the perfect response!

 

[Cevno]

don't want to get involved in this one or take sides but the card in me says that u missed the perfect response!

What? Go ahead and post it. Not that tough to respond to that one.

 

[Shri]

Wait a minute why the **** is everyone arguing here when Morgan was the one who made a mistake by not reviewing the decision? He thought he nicked it? His fault. There is nothing here to argue about for either side ffs.

 

[vcs]

Neither of the decisions (Pietersen or Morgan) were so blatantly wrong, like the Chanderpaul one, to deserve so much argument/discussion IMHO. Can't believe such a big deal is being made out of it. Both could have gone either way.

 

[Bun]

Hawkeye can not be trusted!

Which is it? You can't have your cake and eat it when it comes to HawkEye - you've been one of its biggest critics so you can't all of a sudden turn round and trust the technology just because it shows India were harshly done by.

arre yaar, read that again, I said plumb according to commentators and hawkeye. tragic!

more to the point, that's a very stupid and convenient bucketing of my thoughts with that of bccis's. i've argued it's the predictive element of hawkeye is what gets my goat. I am fully for the mat and actual tracking till point of impact.

I guess had we used mat and ordinary tracker, we'd have got a reversal, but nm......

 

[Bun]

Wait a minute why the **** is everyone arguing here when Morgan was the one who made a mistake by not reviewing the decision? He thought he nicked it? His fault. There is nothing here to argue about for either side ffs.

we've come to a point where the sanity of the batsman is now at stake.

 

[Shri]

we've come to a point where the sanity of the batsman is now at stake.

Your posts make me want to question my sanity.