Aussies get what they want EVERYTIME IN THE ICC and have done for so long.
The difference now is that the BCCI has grown some balls due their financial power to object to it.So now their media and board is trying to show India's objection to unfairness as "Bullying" and doing it very well with support from other media outlets like englsh one ,as well as kiwi ones.Surprised they have not joined in this time more like these articles-
http://www.stuff.co.nz/thepress/4750734a27263.html
What is really remarkable is that they do this to perfection everytime to protect themselves from correct allegations of getting favours from the authorities.While the Indian writers and media seem incapable of responding to it or do not have the will or tactfulness to do it.
Now Despite Gambhir being banned (without any appeal hearing), ponting,watson,katich and johnson being let go,it is BCCI that is using unduue influence over the ICC.
During India's tour there despite India now twice in two tours having to deal with bucknor favouring the aussies,It was the BCCI that was using undue influence.
Despite Proctor banning bhajji without any evidence it was BCCI that was using the undue influence.
Despite malcolm speed selectively mentioning yuvraj incident to threaten proctor and overlooking even worse dissent of pontin it was the BCCI that was using undue influence.
Despite India dropping charges over hogg, and symonds being let go scot free despite being the instigator and admitting to it It was the BCCI that was using undue influence.
Despite bhajji getting fined for a pretty normal abuse(that too incomplete),which he admiited to despite being no proof of it ,It was bahjji who was the villain and symonds the victim and the BCCI using undue influence.Not too forget symonds was let go without any charges despite admitting to be the instigator and admitting that harbhajan could have called him "maa ki".
Despite Harbhajan being targetted by the aussie crowd in a ver bad way by the aussie crowd and being callled all sorts of things,no action was taken against the aussies nor was that or murali being hit by a egg a issue nor were disgraceful chants against Monty Panesar.While Symonds being targetted In India was blown out of proportion with the ICC getting involved and even other boards commenting on it.It was mafe to look as if india is a racist country and people were targetting him due to him being from some other ethnicity,when it was completely different and still the BCCI was using undue influence.
The traditional rulers of the ICC are not liking the fact that some other board is challenging their sole power which has remained for so long by default.So expect these kind of attempts to continue till and even after parity is gained in terms of control over the crikcet adminstration.