chaminda_00
Hall of Fame Member
When did we have 'every possible break to avoid it.' Were we ever informed that both our best overseas players were going to retired off. All you had to do was tell me that our side was going to be 5-10 point above every other side if we kept these two guys. So either I could drop them or adjust the stats of other overseas players to make all the teams even in terms of stats. If you went about it that way I would have no problem changes things around. Instead you just cut our best overseas players without saying a thing.TBH, the complaints are falling on deaf ears.
When I did this, all teams were treated equally with one team, the Power, treated more equally than others.
I feared there would be complaints and gave the Power every possible break to avoid it. Despite the Power getting maginally preferential treatment there are still complaints. I find that very annoying.
You had to do that cus you stuffed up and put in a player twiceI added a player to the squad you wanted which I doubt Id have done for any other team.
Explain to me how then the best overseas players from every other club didn't get retired off and only our best overseas players got retired off. I wouldn't have a problem if those two guys were retired off if the likes of Celestine, Okada, Andersen, Frisk etc were alse retired off as well. But no we were the only club who had their best overseas players retired off.The reasons why players have been removed is so people can draft for need with sign-ins and draft picks. Most Non-CWebbers on squads will be full-time back-ups. Leaving in all non-CW players would un balance squads.
Last edited: