nightprowler10
Global Moderator
LOL, Miandad the only Pakistani on the list.
Good work Fiery, how's the young'un btw.
Good work Fiery, how's the young'un btw.
-
Welcome to the Cricket Web forums, one of the biggest forums in the world dedicated to cricket.
You are currently viewing our boards as a guest which gives you limited access to view most discussions and access our other features. By joining our free community you will have access to post topics, respond to polls, upload content and access many other special features. Registration is fast, simple and absolutely free so please, join the Cricket Web community today!
If you have any problems with the registration process or your account login, please contact us.
***Official*** Pakistan in South Africa
- Thread starter nightprowler10
- Start date
Saurav Ganguly
Banned
Ponting is in the list because of traditional anti-Pakistan of ICC & their so called "panel of experts".Without any doubt,Ponting is one of the top 10 cricketers of last 10 years or so but in 2006,it was just Yousuf,Yousuf & Yousuf!
Last edited:
nightprowler10
Global Moderator
Better than his Faisalabad 05 knock against England when he batted with the tail and scored a ton?
Jono
Virat Kohli (c)
Arghhhhhhhhhh!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!1!!!!!!!!!!11!!!!!!!1!!
ICC number 1 batsman at the end of the year doesn't mean "who was the best batsman in said calendar year" it is based over more than the last 12 months.
That's **** posting, just ****. FFS!
nightprowler10
Global Moderator
Don't quite understand ICC's rankings do you?
Langeveldt
Soutie
300 for Ntini, very well done
Jono
Virat Kohli (c)
Yes, this one is in foreign (and tougher batting) conditions with his team 1-0 down in the series against a better bowling attack.
nightprowler10
Global Moderator
Indeed. Time to take back my 'over rated' comment about him.
Saurav Ganguly
Banned
Ntini is a good bowler but he is not in the category of Pollock,Bond,Akhtar,Asif etc.
nightprowler10
Global Moderator
I thought he batted better and worked with the tail even better in Faisalabad, but I do see your point, especially considering he was in his best form back then and has been out of form for a while coming into this match.
As I type, Inzamam cracks one for four. Brilliant.
Fiery
Banned
She's good thanks mate. Her and my lady are at Grandma's for the weekend hence my overtime on Cricket Web
Saurav Ganguly
Banned
Ofcourse I do understand.Yousuf was matchless from October/November 2005 till 31st December(even u exclude his performance in last 2 months or so i.e against West Indies).
Slow Love™
International Captain
Inzy tearing it up here. This is great stuff to watch. Hopefully not jinxing anything, but heading for a great ton.
And congrats to Ntini on his 300 test wickets. Great achievement. You could tell that Smith was a bit dissatisfied with the group hug and really wanted some one-on-one time during the celebrations.
And congrats to Ntini on his 300 test wickets. Great achievement. You could tell that Smith was a bit dissatisfied with the group hug and really wanted some one-on-one time during the celebrations.
Slow Love™
International Captain
Aaaaaaaargh!
nightprowler10
Global Moderator
Damn You!! Inzi stranded on 92. Inzi still doesn't have a ton against RSA.Slow Love™;1048453 said:
haroon510
International 12th Man
how does the rating works? i mean how do they choose the batsman's number? how come we don't see any pakistan batsman there except mindad? inzi had his best years in his career, saeed anwar was top class opener of all time for pakistan, zahir abbas another wonderful batsman. 2006 was yousuf's year but how come pointing is number one? he hasn't make as many runs as yousuf.
i don't see any Sir Lankan batsman there. arvinda de silva and rana tunga both were top performer of the mid 90s. how come they are not on that list?
nightprowler10
Global Moderator
Akhtar may not bowl again in this test. Huge blow considering how well he bowled in the first inning.
godofcricket
State 12th Man
Well the other thing might be, as i heard from the news is that Shoaib was having a big argument with Woolmer this morning, so maybe they are covering it up?