As it stands right now with India/Chappell, I agree with you. He has done a great enough job in Test cricket to have job security. He should even be applauded for the job he's done, IMO. However, let's just say for the sake of the argument that he turns India into England when it comes to ODI's, but continues to do well in Test. Well then I don't know how supportive I would be of him. I don't know if I would fire him, but if the ODI's performance stays crappy for a long time, I will begin to question him. His job is to make India better at CRICKET, not just TEST cricket. So if I was the boss, he would get a LOT of leeway with me for doing well in Tests, but that doesn't mean he's not accountable for ODI's. Have to take the Aussie approach and not show weakness in any form of the game. Also, I would suggest to you that if the team is consistently performing below standards in ODI's, then there is a deeper issue at work that needs to be fixed. You lose enough time in ODI's, and it will mess with a team's confidence. Most of that same team will also be playing Test cricket. Better to carry over positive vibes rather than negative, don't you agree?