Watling was part of a world record partnership this year and has been superb with the gloves to both spinners and pace bowlers. Unless AB is taking the gloves it has to be him.Big problem with finding a better pure keeper than Sarfraz is that there haven't been too many good batsman-keepers this year. De Villiers hasn't kept all that much this year and he's been underwhelming this year (though in fairness he batted very well against Australia), Watling's been OK but probably not quite World XI standard, and who else? Yes Sarfraz was poor against New Zealand, but I don't think he was that bad against Australia?
He's only played at home this year though, hasn't he? I mean I rate him and all but he has had the benefit of being picked and rotated when injury concerns have been an issue and missing the UAE tour must be good for any bowlers stats.I understand your point, but he *is* significantly better than anyone else when he plays. The worst thing you can say about a Harris spell is he went for bugger all runs when the ball wasn't doing much and still asked questions of the batsmen. Aside from Steyn, he'd be first bowler I would pick.
He sort of won us a series in SA...Watling was part of a world record partnership this year and has been superb with the gloves to both spinners and pace bowlers. Unless AB is taking the gloves it has to be him.
He's only played at home this year though, hasn't he? I mean I rate him and all but he has had the benefit of being picked and rotated when injury concerns have been an issue and missing the UAE tour must be good for any bowlers stats.
There are other bowlers that have done more this year.
He sort of won us a series in SA...
Yeah he just doesn't ever bowl a bad spell, does he?Nah he played the whole home ashes series then in SA as well where he bowled us to victory late in one of the tests iirc.
My point is I rate him that highly that he has to be in my XI. If Steyn missed half SA's tests, I'd still name him. They're both that good from where I sit. All opinion, obvs.
He didn't have a good Test year either. 17 wickets @ 44.11Spudeed Ajmal worth a mention for chucking so hard that the testers had to get out a protractor to figure out just how much he was over the limit.
Problem is he's not going to out-do Warner with 6 tons & McCullum with a triple, 2 doubles & a 195 in terms of openers. It's the scoring rate Warner & McCullum score at that makes their runs so much more valuable vs. their opponents.Imo Brathwaite deserves a spot in this team...three tons in three consecutive series and is averaging near 90 this year.
56 wickets in 9 tests at 27 is not lethal enough by the Herath?No spin bowler, other than Ajmal I don't think any spin bowler has been lethal this year and I'd rather have the four form seamers.
Actually thought about including him, but there are more players who had a better year. And he's averaging 77, not nearly 90 (unless 13 counts as a 'nearly' length gap) but whatever eh? Good numbers, helped by a double tonne vs Bangladesh and missed a few games but he didn't dominate proceedings like some of the other players mentioned. Going by your description Joe Root would 'deserve' a spot as well.Imo Brathwaite deserves a spot in this team...three tons in three consecutive series and is averaging near 90 this year.
Yeah Herath is a must have. Without him you may never have won the Pakistan series at least.How anyone could leave out the guy who got the most wickets (56) and had the best figures (9/102) for the year is beyond me. Surely there's room for one spinner? The alien XI don't play in the subcontinent?
Bowling records | Test matches | Cricinfo Statsguru | ESPN Cricinfo