Z-Man
U19 Vice-Captain
Get to the point? I do not like trolls.wow.......Z-Man.........how old are you?
Get to the point? I do not like trolls.wow.......Z-Man.........how old are you?
lickable..This one is somewhat likeable IMO:
I was to the point actually..........you said Dhoni is the best captain that you have seen live.......I was wondering how old are you and since when have you been watching cricket???? Why is that trolling??? It is alright if you don't want to answer thatGet to the point? I do not like trolls.
This one is somewhat likeable IMO:
haha....I think I'll go with Himannv's verdict of likable as opposed to lickable................lickable..
The footlong tongue in the image begs to differI was to the point actually..........you said Dhoni is the best captain that you have seen live.......I was wondering how old are you and since when have you been watching cricket???? Why is that trolling??? It is alright if you don't want to answer that
haha....I think I'll go with Himannv's verdict of likable as opposed to lickable................
That's what I'm desperately hoping about Clarke, considering I think he's a bit of a half-wit who just parrots the latest PR guff. I'm on a hiding to nothing though, I know that.You could be a great and inspirational leader of men and still be as dumb as bricks tbh.
Yeah, Smith has a double first from Cambridge, which puts him in something like the top 0.01% of the UK, intelligence-wise. I suspect he's the only test cricket to have an Oxbridge double first.That Ed Smith bloke's quite smart, isn't he? He was only in the England team for about five minutes, but I think he's written a book or two.
Not in Sir Arthur Conan Doyle's league, though, of course.
Sorry. It's a university degree classification. In the UK we have first class honours degrees, higher second class, lower second class, third class & ordinary non-honours degrees.what do you mean by a double from Cambridge?
watt?Realistically it's probably this chap as he's the sole first-class cricketer to be a Nobel laureate.
I didn't criticise his decision to secure the draw and the series win, but he's a pretty defensive captain sometimes. I'm always shocked when a relatively new batsmen hits a 4 and Dhoni immediately places a boundary rider there or a long on.Dhoni's predicament :
1) Play safe, ensure series win : cop flak from internet posters and media.
2) Play for the 'spirit of the game', lose the match and draw the series : have his house burned down/stoned.
Jeez, what a life!
This.I didn't criticise his decision to secure the draw and the series win, but he's a pretty defensive captain sometimes. I'm always shocked when a relatively new batsmen hits a 4 and Dhoni immediately places a boundary rider there or a long on.
When Sammy came into bat in one of his brief innings he was greeted with three boundary riders facing Bhaji because he'd smacked a couple sixes the previous match.
What a genius!!!!Stuart Clark's not exactly dumb, has a degree from Sydney Uni (in Commerce IIRC).
Although I agree on the general point that Dhoni is a reasonable defensive captain, having a boundary rider to a spinner isn't a defensive move as such. It's a move which attempts to eliminate a player's 'go to' shot, and makes them think of other areas to score where they may not be so strong in.I didn't criticise his decision to secure the draw and the series win, but he's a pretty defensive captain sometimes. I'm always shocked when a relatively new batsmen hits a 4 and Dhoni immediately places a boundary rider there or a long on.
When Sammy came into bat in one of his brief innings he was greeted with three boundary riders facing Bhaji because he'd smacked a couple sixes the previous match.