I said, rank them in order!Voted for Thomson. Aggressive and a far more potent wicket taker compared to the others in that list.
Took two posts for that word to appearAre we talking about peaks?
Ah, you need to press the keys on your keyboard harder!!I said, rank them in order!
How long is a peak?Are we talking about peaks?
Depends on which player is being supported in the argumentHow long is a peak?
Depends on which player is being supported in the argument
I don't know how you could have Gillespie as the worst bowler of the group. He is a better bowler then Gough, Streak and arguably Thomson and had better careers then those three aswell.1) Heath Streak
2) Jeff Thomson
3) Ian Botham
4) Darren Gough
5) Jason Gillespie
If Streak had ever got someone good support him on the other end,his record would've been much better.And my ranking is based on overall career,not just peaks or something.
Tbf, a l ot of blokes who faced Thommo didn't see much of him either.Botham
Thomson(haven't seen much of him though)
Gillespie
Gough
Streak
But man getting his in balls >>>> All.
IMO,They were bowlers of same class & there was only a little difference among them all.But I rate Streak as better than others so he has to be at the top.It isn't like being at the bottom makes him a poor bowler or something.I don't know how you could have Gillespie as the worst bowler of the group. He is a better bowler then Gough, Streak and arguably Thomson and had better careers then those three aswell.
It's either Botham or Gillespie for mine. I voted for Gillespie because he is awsome.
ha ha...good one...Depends on which player is being supported in the argument