BhupinderSingh
Banned
Bill O'Reilly.
For once I agree with youBill O'Reilly.
Yeah, pretty much the same here.Not qualified enough to make that judgment, That option should be there..
I didn't watch O'Reilly and if Shane warne was an ordinary spinner, I would have picked O'Reilly over him based on what I have read and heard in the cricket history but Mr. Warne was one heck of a spinner and hence my inability to make a decision.
Have you ? If not how can you make the judgement that Warne is easily the best spinner ever ?Btw,all you guys who have voted in favour of Tiger O'Reilly, have you seen him bowl??
AWTANot qualified enough to make that judgment, That option should .
Warne.
Uncovered pitches, bats of old, and still an S/R of almost 70? No thanks.
Don't mean to suggest that O'Reilly was not a great bowler but Warne pretty easily IMO.
What an excellent view to take.I think the thing to note is that there was so much more to Warne than mere bowling.
It's very conceivable to me that there was little to divide the two purely on bowling - nor Grimmett neither, for that matter. Or Murali.
But we can't really say for certain. I'm happy that they were roughly equals, personally.
What about Stuart MacGill in the West Indies?Shane Warne stood out far more than O'Reilly
Some debate over whether O'Reilly was the greater LBG bowler over Grimmett
No teammate even close to Warne during his reign