Ervine is much better then Watson.Waughney said:Maybe, but not as a regular player. People like Watson are more likely.
Ervine is much better then Watson.Waughney said:Maybe, but not as a regular player. People like Watson are more likely.
1/ Watson can't make the current Aussie sideWaughney said:How? If Watson can make the current Australian team he must be good. Ervine's bowling is too inaccurate and inconsistent.
1)He's just coming back from injury but beforehand he was becoming a regularMr. Ponting said:1/ Watson can't make the current Aussie side
2/ Ervines batting is far superior in MY opinion to Watson
3/ Ervine is about equal with Watson bowling wise
or mark vermeulen for that matter.....Prince EWS said:Theres nothing wrong with Gripper!
Well its just my opinion mate. I reckon Ervine can match Watto in all areas.Waughney said:He's improved greatley since then (especially in the batting department) But is still no match for Watson.
Yeah ok. I took it on board because I sort of started the argument.Waughney said:That's fine, my post was more in reply to Neil, saying that he was a good player
In about four years time.Neil Pickup said:From what I saw of Ervine in England in 2003, I hope he's an Australian regular soon..
where did fawad and akhtar come from and afridiShahid Afridi
Shoaib Akhtar
Fawad Alam
Steve Waugh
Shiv Chanderpaul
-END-
They aren't necessarily the best but they have the biggest wow-factors, and I love Fawad Alam in general, see my sig.where did fawad and akhtar come from and afridi