Who has beatin Australia In odi more then any other team since 1999?

[shaka]

No team has broken past 6 victories

 

[age_master]

South Africa probably will next time they play. ENgland have the chance to but its unlikley due to the catching up.

 

[SJS]

Draw your own conclusions...

LEAST WORST OF ALL LOSERS​

South Africa: P19 W5 L11 T3 [34%] - RR 4.63, CR 5.07 (NR -0.44)

Sri Lanka: P20 W6 L14 [30%] - RR 4.62, CR 4.99 (NR -0.37)

West Indies: P24 W6 L16 T1 NR1 [28%] - RR 4.63, CR 5.13 (NR -0.50)

New Zealand: P24 W6 L17 NR1 [26%] - RR 4.67, CR 5.21 (NR -0.54)

Pakistan: P25 W6 L18 NR1 [25%] - RR 4.47, CR 5.20 (NR -0.73)

India: P26 W5 L20 NR1 [20%] - RR 4.92, CR 5.75 (NR -0.83)

England: P18 W3 L15 [17%] - RR 4.36, CR 4.99 (NR -0.63)

Zimbabwe: P16 L15 NR1 [0%] - RR 4.53, CR 5.74 (NR -1.21)

Kenya: P3 L3 [0%] - RR 3.40, CR 4.80 (NR -1.40)

Bangladesh: P5 L5 [0%] - RR 3.15, CR 6.17 (NR -3.02)

And the winner is .......

 

[dinu23]

bit surprised WI is up there in the top three

 

[FaaipDeOiad]

bit surprised WI is up there in the top three

It's primarily because in 2003 they won a few dead rubbers in a row against Australia.

 

[Scaly piscine]

South Africa probably will next time they play. ENgland have the chance to but its unlikley due to the catching up.

England would only have to win 4 of the probable 7 games with Australia, I can certainly see England doing it with their full strength side with Australia to bring the best out of them - it's not like one of those end of term series where England don't give a toss or when they're still speculating over a couple of places over their Test XI.

 

[FaaipDeOiad]

England would only have to win 4 of the probable 7 games with Australia, I can certainly see England doing it with their full strength side with Australia to bring the best out of them - it's not like one of those end of term series where England don't give a toss or when they're still speculating over a couple of places over their Test XI.

If England win 4 out of 7 against Australia, I'll eat my hat.

 

[vic_orthdox]

with Australia to bring the best out of them

You make that sound so easy.

when they're still speculating over a couple of places over their Test XI.

Bell/Pieterson anyone? Jones/Anderson anyone? (I'll get shot down for saying that, but if Anderson were to play a few one dayers and do well, you'd be seeing him in the test team.)

 

[Scaly piscine]

If England win 4 out of 7 against Australia, I'll eat my hat.

Do you remember how comprehensively outplayed Australia were last time they played England? England aren't usually up for these trivial ODI series, but I think they'll have a point to prove against Australia and this (hopefully, barring injury) will be the first time Pietersen and Flintoff have batted together. I'm not sure who'll play at number 9 tho, but I'm hoping Strauss opens and England will have a top 7 without an obvious weakness for the first time (in ODIs) in years, maybe decades.

 

[Scaly piscine]

You make that sound so easy.

Bell/Pieterson anyone? Jones/Anderson anyone? (I'll get shot down for saying that, but if Anderson were to play a few one dayers and do well, you'd be seeing him in the test team.)

The only speculation there is from the media. With two Tests against Bangladesh, I don't see the situation changing as it's pretty unlikely for someone to do so spectacularly badly against them that they manage to get dropped. There might well be injuries, but until then there's no uncertainty as to the XI that will be play against Bangladesh and Australia in the Tests.

 

[marc71178]

India: P26 W5 L20 NR1 [20%] - RR 4.92, CR 5.75 (NR -0.83)
England: P18 W3 L15 [17%] - RR 4.36, CR 4.99 (NR -0.63)
Pakistan: P25 W6 L18 NR1 [25%] - RR 4.47, CR 5.20 (NR -0.73)
Sri Lanka: P20 W6 L14 [30%] - RR 4.62, CR 4.99 (NR -0.37)
West Indies: P24 W6 L16 T1 NR1 [28%] - RR 4.63, CR 5.13 (NR -0.50)
South Africa: P19 W5 L11 T3 [34%] - RR 4.63, CR 5.07 (NR -0.44)
New Zealand: P24 W6 L17 NR1 [26%] - RR 4.67, CR 5.21 (NR -0.54)
Zimbabwe: P16 L15 NR1 [0%] - RR 4.53, CR 5.74 (NR -1.21)
Bangladesh: P5 L5 [0%] - RR 3.15, CR 6.17 (NR -3.02)
Kenya: P3 L3 [0%] - RR 3.40, CR 4.80 (NR -1.40)

Draw your own conclusions...

They're too good.

 

[marc71178]

alot of those wins would have been dead rubbers too

That is no excuse.

 

[tooextracool]

Do you remember how comprehensively outplayed Australia were last time they played England? England aren't usually up for these trivial ODI series, but I think they'll have a point to prove against Australia and this (hopefully, barring injury) will be the first time Pietersen and Flintoff have batted together. I'm not sure who'll play at number 9 tho, but I'm hoping Strauss opens and England will have a top 7 without an obvious weakness for the first time (in ODIs) in years, maybe decades.

err collingwood, vaughan.

 

[FaaipDeOiad]

Do you remember how comprehensively outplayed Australia were last time they played England? England aren't usually up for these trivial ODI series, but I think they'll have a point to prove against Australia and this (hopefully, barring injury) will be the first time Pietersen and Flintoff have batted together. I'm not sure who'll play at number 9 tho, but I'm hoping Strauss opens and England will have a top 7 without an obvious weakness for the first time (in ODIs) in years, maybe decades.

Umm, that was one game. You will notice I never said "England will not win a game", I said they won't win 4 out of 7, which they won't, not in a million years, and if they do I'll be reaching for the knife and fork.

England have two fantastically talented ODI players in Flintoff and Pietersen, and some able support in Trescothick, Strauss and so on. Their bowling is severely lacking, with Harmison and Hoggard having a poor time of it in ODIs, and rubbish players like Kabir Ali being brought in, who would get belted all around the park against Australia. Simon Jones might do okay in ODIs, that is yet to be seen, but feel free to tell me who you think is going to restrict Australia's scoring 4 times in 7 games, because frankly I can't see it, and with Vaughan and so on in the side I don't think England are capable of hitting 275+ scores very often against Australia either.

 

[Scaly piscine]

Umm, that was one game. You will notice I never said "England will not win a game", I said they won't win 4 out of 7, which they won't, not in a million years, and if they do I'll be reaching for the knife and fork.

England have two fantastically talented ODI players in Flintoff and Pietersen, and some able support in Trescothick, Strauss and so on. Their bowling is severely lacking, with Harmison and Hoggard having a poor time of it in ODIs, and rubbish players like Kabir Ali being brought in, who would get belted all around the park against Australia. Simon Jones might do okay in ODIs, that is yet to be seen, but feel free to tell me who you think is going to restrict Australia's scoring 4 times in 7 games, because frankly I can't see it, and with Vaughan and so on in the side I don't think England are capable of hitting 275+ scores very often against Australia either.

Harmison has been good in ODIs, just not in SA and early on in his England career where he was rubbish in all forms of the game - he was very good in the CT, where he and Flintoff as bowlers were awesome and even compensated for Wharf & Gough until the final.

 

[aussie]

Conclusion: Australia has whupped the $hit out of all teams... to say one country is doing better against them is like saying you are the best of a bunch of losers....

well said mate, it makes you wonder when we come to the conclusion of who has beaten the aussies most in the last 5 years what will it prove?

 

[honestbharani]

Actually, I would like to know which team has the best ODI win percentage against Australia overall....

 

[Richard]

Harmison has been good in ODIs, just not in SA and early on in his England career where he was rubbish in all forms of the game - he was very good in the CT, where he and Flintoff as bowlers were awesome and even compensated for Wharf & Gough until the final.

Amazing what lengths this one'll go to to make Durham and\or England players look good, isn't it?
Harmison has been good in ODIs for less than half his career, all of which was in the summer of 2004. He's played 23 ODIs (excluding against Zimbabwe) - figures read:
Summer 2004: 98.5 409 19 4.13 21.52
Excluding summer 2004: 102.4 575 11 5.60 52.27

 

[Richard]

South Africa probably will next time they play. ENgland have the chance to but its unlikley due to the catching up.

You ARE joking, right?
England, beat Australia in ODIs? I'd not rule-out Australia winning 7-0 this coming summer.

 

[RealPk]

I think its Pakistan, ok they have also lost a lot against them but they have also given them some lessons ^^ (what other countries couldnt..these were just wins, if they won..)

Pakistan is developping extremely under BoB Woolmer...wow..


BTW:

Yes, but invariably close hasn't proven good enough!

HI marc..now you see the concistency in pakistani batting? Satisfied?

I mean...overall concistency....7 wins in a row..^^