i was being a bit ironic really...hence the 'hehehehe'...of course we dont know the details etc...I was pre-empting what many people will say ie Drugs=cheat,which I dont agree with...anyone tried playing cricket after a spliff or 5????Mr Mxyzptlk said:Inappropriate title as the thread only talks of one player suspected. Even so, it's still inappropriate because he has neither been convicted nor does a conviction give any of us any licence to insult him.
Please change the title of the threadSwervy said:i was being a bit ironic really...hence the 'hehehehe'...of course we dont know the details etc...I was pre-empting what many people will say ie Drugs=cheat,which I dont agree with...anyone tried playing cricket after a spliff or 5????
would do if I knew how....luckyeddie said:Please change the title of the thread
no, 3 maybe...not 5Swervy said:anyone tried playing cricket after a spliff or 5????
No this player hasnt been convicted...an we dont know who the player is.Mr Mxyzptlk said:Inappropriate title as the thread only talks of one player suspected. Even so, it's still inappropriate because he has neither been convicted nor does a conviction give any of us any licence to insult him.
Your friendly local moderator helps out.Swervy said:all that said..I will happily change the title of the thread for fear of upsetting a) the more sensitive people here and b) Marc, who I beleive is a Warks fan.
Only problem is..I dont know how to.
you have your uses dont youNeil Pickup said:Your friendly local moderator helps out.
Is that the opening statement in a debate?Swervy said:you have your uses dont you
I think I am all debated out on this forum at the momentluckyeddie said:Is that the opening statement in a debate?
The 'ignore' list can be your friend. I use it when things start getting tedious (like now) - not because I don't necessarily wish to read the contributions from certain members, but because I don't want to get into the habit of 'biting back'. The nonsense which has been bouncing back and forth is to the detriment of the overall site.Swervy said:I think I am all debated out on this forum at the moment
I dont mind reading the stuff people are writing..its just I have very little now to add to a lot of what is being said now..most people know my opinions on these topics that have been going on for what seems like months now.luckyeddie said:The 'ignore' list can be your friend. I use it when things start getting tedious (like now) - not because I don't necessarily wish to read the contributions from certain members, but because I don't want to get into the habit of 'biting back'. The nonsense which has been bouncing back and forth is to the detriment of the overall site.
Note that I'm not saying that people are not entitled to discuss matters, get involved in banter or even debates and arguments. It's the 14 or 15 consecutive posts or the single post with a dozen or more quotes which basically look, well, stupid - and this invariably is followed by another of the same from t'other side.
really..i still dont know who it is..i will go and investigatemarc71178 said:How come you didn't know the player in question by 5.22 Swervy?
It was all over the web by lunchtime.
I just hope the suspension doesn't carry over to WCC, although from what I read I don't know why it's worthy of a ban.
Good old friendly local moderators... we're not exactly local to Swervy, though, are we?Neil Pickup said:Your friendly local moderator helps out.