By far the superior....... ???sledger said:play nic ekiddies , seeing as the entire forum has turned into warne vs someone it seems as if ashley should get a look in :P
personally it wud seem obvious to me that giles is by far the superior...
116 wickets @ 36.81 far superior than 541 @ 25.59?sledger said:personally it wud seem obvious to me that giles is by far the superior...
Gilchrist versus Parthiv Patel .KishanTeli said:LOL, do we even need to answer that??
While we are at it ....
McGrath v Nehra?
Well said. I think someone was trying to think of something to say and this was the best they could come up with.viktor said:should this be in the Cricket Humour section???
I didn't realise Patel had grown?SJS said:Gilchrist versus Parthiv Patel .
In wicket keeping of course. In batting there is no comparison. Parthiv is head and shoulders above Gilchrist.....when Gilchrist is sitting of course.
Thats funnymarc71178 said:I didn't realise Patel had grown?
But you see Giles didn't have any good support for a while which means batsmen could see him off, Warne on the other hand has been lucky......Sudeep said:116 wickets @ 36.81 far superior than 541 @ 25.59?
...you don't consider Harmison, Caddick and Gough to be good enough? You certainly have high standards for bowlers.twctopcat said:But you see Giles didn't have any good support for a while which means batsmen could see him off, Warne on the other hand has been lucky......
For a while i said, Gough was yes and Caddick could be, but he ain't no mcgrath, .Western Warrior said:...you don't consider Harmison, Caddick and Gough to be good enough? You certainly have high standards for bowlers.
Who is?twctopcat said:For a while i said, Gough was yes and Caddick could be, but he ain't no mcgrath, .