• Welcome to the Cricket Web forums, one of the biggest forums in the world dedicated to cricket.

    You are currently viewing our boards as a guest which gives you limited access to view most discussions and access our other features. By joining our free community you will have access to post topics, respond to polls, upload content and access many other special features. Registration is fast, simple and absolutely free so please, join the Cricket Web community today!

    If you have any problems with the registration process or your account login, please contact us.

*Unofficial* New Zealand Black Caps Thread

Immenso

International Vice-Captain
9, or 8 and a half?, years is a very long time to be a coach. Certainly a national coach.

Different for pro clubs or franchises, though.

From an nz perspective. Can only think of Lois Muir (netball) and Mike Walsh (softball).

Wait, duh. Just remembered Henry, then Hansen for ABs. Well, this was a pointless post.
 

jcas0167

International Regular
Yeah, although that seemed kinda accidental - Stead didn't go into that 2023 World Cup with the plan of batting him at the top of the order.
True, Ravindra made the squad because Bracewell was injured. But they did open with him in a trial game where he got 90 odd. Then when Williamson was injured went with him rather than say Chapman which would have been the more conservative option. I mean I agree Stead tended to opt for veterans where he could but it often worked out and at this point there are plenty of younger guys who are well placed to kick on.
 

Bahnz

Cricket Web: All-Time Legend
Stead's handling of Rachin was one of the biggest black marks against him as a coach. Here you had this generational batting talent who bowled a bit of handy SLA, and what did Stead do with him? Play him as a bowling allrounder and bat him at number 7. Ultimately it all worked out in the end, but it was absolutely more by luck than design.
 

vandem

State Captain
... For me the last straw was selecting Kuggeleijn over Nathan Smith because he'd "done his time in domestix".
Pedant point, assume you are discussing Kuggs test debut at Mount vs England in early 2023, it was Kuggs and Duffy in squad ahead of other options (e.g. Smith) when Boult and Henry not available, but my larger gripe was Kuggs over Duffy in playing XI, gave an unbalanced 1 swing bowler + 3 whack-it-in seamer mix in a day/night game where Duffy under lights could have been very useful, just because Kuggs offered more runs at #8.

Not considering personal issues about Kuggs.
 

Chubb

International Regular
Pedant point, assume you are discussing Kuggs test debut at Mount vs England in early 2023, it was Kuggs and Duffy in squad ahead of other options (e.g. Smith) when Boult and Henry not available, but my larger gripe was Kuggs over Duffy in playing XI, gave an unbalanced 1 swing bowler + 3 whack-it-in seamer mix in a day/night game where Duffy under lights could have been very useful, just because Kuggs offered more runs at #8.

Not considering personal issues about Kuggs.
I'd sooner Duffy over Kuggs as well :)
 

Mike5181

International Captain
He's kind of lucky Will Young has turned things around a bit because under Stead he was very nearly a completely wasted talent as well. Not saying Young knocked every opportunity out of the park but he got ****ed around a lot while Stead had his Nicholls obsession.
 

ataraxia

International Coach
He's kind of lucky Will Young has turned things around a bit because under Stead he was very nearly a completely wasted talent as well. Not saying Young knocked every opportunity out of the park but he got ****ed around a lot while Stead had his Nicholls obsession.
And yet Young was picked over Conway for two tests when Conway was averaging about 70 in the PS. That was just strange.
 

_Ed_

Request Your Custom Title Now!
He was randomly promoted up the order to open in the Pakistan warm-up game and top-scored with 97 (then batted 3 in the first game of the tournament and got a century). But he'd never batted higher than 6 in any of his ODIs before that, so it didn't strike me as premeditated.
 

Athlai

Not Terrible
I think this kind of criticism was more on the mark a couple of years ago (or at latest in terms of persevering with Southee). If you look at the past two seasons O'Rourke, Sears, Foulkes, Smith have been introduced with reasonable success. Henry has stepped up to lead the attack now Southee, Boult, Wagner have moved on. Duffy has come back better than before. In the batting Robinson, Mariu, Abbas, Foxcroft, Clarkson have gained some white ball experience along with Mitch Hay. Ravindra has obviously stepped up replacing Nicholls and is one of the best in the world. Phillips has taken over Bracewell's all-rounder role. Santner seems to have improved but there is reasonable depth behind him in the spin ranks.
Are we going to ignore how drawn out and poor those transitions were? Some of these results might have ended up as victories rather than 2nd places with better coaching and selection.

I don't think we can celebrate Stead as the reason NZC has a depth of talent in this era,
 

Flem274*

123/5
Are we going to ignore how drawn out and poor those transitions were? Some of these results might have ended up as victories rather than 2nd places with better coaching and selection.

I don't think we can celebrate Stead as the reason NZC has a depth of talent in this era,
Yeah, generally golden areas are created 10 years prior to the results. That's not to say international coaches don't add the extra percent, but great teams are made by great systems.
 

jcas0167

International Regular
Are we going to ignore how drawn out and poor those transitions were? Some of these results might have ended up as victories rather than 2nd places with better coaching and selection.

I don't think we can celebrate Stead as the reason NZC has a depth of talent in this era,
The claim was that the team is going to be hampered in future. I don't think that's the case as there are loads of guys who are ready to step up now.

I don't know of any tournaments we would have fared better with different selections? Maybe Conway should have played the Champions Trophy final. They could have maybe backed the likes of Ajaz more in that 2022 England tour. It's hard to know how much that was Stead or Kane who sometimes seemed reluctant to bowl spinners.

I agree they stuck with some guys for too long. The main ones I can think of are Nicholls being perserved with for the Bangladesh tests after Ravindra had a break through world cup. Nicholls was coming off a double ton in his last test but I don't think anyone was surprised he struggled in that series. Also, I would have liked to see Jamieson play in the Australia 2019/20 series. They probably could have moved on from Ross Taylor after the 2021 India series although I'm glad they gave him the home summer. Southee was kind of in the same boat last season. Henry should have played ahead of him in Sri Lanka and he was fortunate to get the England home tests.
 

SteveNZ

International Coach
Stead inherited the strongest team we've had and managed to steward it fairly well but agree entirely that his conservative approach has and will continue to impact us for years to come.
How so? We have a batch of young guys who have been exposed to international cricket and whilst, ideally, a lot of them would have played more and have more experience, we have a reasonable sense of who might cut it.

All opinions are valid but I can't see how any approach Stead had can't be easily developed upon by the next coach.
 

James

Cricket Web Owner
Bad call in my opinion to appoint an overseas coach (even though he's coached domestically) when you have Shane Bond as an option. With his background, arguably our second greatest ever bowler, and the fact we have a lot of young talented seamers that would benefit greatly from his experience, its a missed opportunity.

Oh well, hope Walter does well regardless.
 
Last edited:

anonymouskefe

U19 Cricketer
Bad call in my opinion to appoint an overseas coach (even though he's coached domestically) when you have Shane Bond as an option. With his background, arguably our second greatest ever bowler, and the fact we have a lot of young talented seamers that would benefit greatly from his experience, its a missed opportunity.

Oh well, hope Walter does well regardless.
Read somewhere saying players wanted rob. More of a reason imo to go bond
 

jcas0167

International Regular
Bad call in my opinion to appoint an overseas coach (even though he's coached domestically) when you have Shane Bond as an option. With his background, arguably our second greatest ever bowler, and the fact we have a lot of young talented seamers that would benefit greatly from his experience, its a missed opportunity.

Oh well, hope Walter does well regardless.
I think Walter will be excellent but I would have loved to see Bond get the job. He seemed to do a great job when he was used as a bowling coach and sounds like he did well as head coach at the Sydney Thunder. Maybe lack of head coaching experience in NZ was the difference but seems like a missed opportunity.
 

Top