Mahela Jayawardene was excellent tactically too, they've definitely lost a little in that department with Sanga at the helm. I certainly rate the tactical side of Jayawardene's captaincy ahead of anyone captaining in international cricket at the minute.
It's a vastly different job captaining Sri Lanka to captaining, say, South Africa though. With all the other **** you have to deal with, tactical acumen is pretty much just a bonus for a South African captain.
Indeed, but I very much doubt that if Mahela recommended a tactic to Sanga, that he wouldn't employ it.
They're a tag team of captaincy IMO. Sanga is more defensive (as I've outlined in a previous thread), but there hasn't been such a ridiculous fall in tactics because:
a) Mahela willingly gave up the captaincy
b) He was kept as VC
c) Him and Sanga are obviously close
So - and I'm sincerely asking - why is he no longer captain? I had a look at some stats and it didn't seem to bother his batting at all, quite the opposite.
It's quite hard to be the captain of a subcontinental team for a long time. It's hard to explain really, but the idiocy of the boards at times and the pressures of the fans can eventually grind.
Mahela obviously felt he could still offer plenty to the team whilst giving Sanga the captaincy, who was always destined to eventually get it.
An example is Dravid quitting when he was just starting to become a gun captain, after the huge series win vs. England in 07.
And the captaincy didn't affect Dravid's batting. If anything his batting has worsened since. Not saying it's due to the captaincy, but the timeline and stats don't suggest captaincy affected his batting, nor that letting go of his captaincy helped his batting.