shaka
International Regular
Warne caught with pants down and cigarette in his mouth, link below:
http://au.sports.yahoo.com/050412/2/426w.html
http://au.sports.yahoo.com/050412/2/426w.html
indeed so i agree,psxpro said:So what? Test players should be judged on test records, not county records.
yes i agree, were it not for warne being ahead of him i doubt he would recieve half as must critisism to be honest.Craig said:Seriously, MacGill is not that bad.
He comes in for some unfair critism on here.
His County record is abysmal though.psxpro said:So what? Test players should be judged on test records, not county records.
marc71178 said:His County record is abysmal though.
And not the dead rubber either!LongHopCassidy said:We won't know until they walk out onto the field. Personally I'd like to see one quality Test, at least.
im fairly sure you will, given that almost every side tends to have at least one quality test against australia in a series. no team can really destroy another test class team in every test, especially in a 5 match series.LongHopCassidy said:We won't know until they walk out onto the field. Personally I'd like to see one quality Test, at least.
West Indies in Australia 2000/01 springs to mind. Absolute mauling, 5 tests in a row, and West Indies weren't great but they were certainly "test class". West Indies destroyed England in 10 consecutive tests in 84 and 85, too.tooextracool said:im fairly sure you will, given that almost every side tends to have at least one quality test against australia in a series. no team can really destroy another test class team in every test, especially in a 5 match series.
surely the test in adelaide was at least competitive?FaaipDeOiad said:West Indies in Australia 2000/01 springs to mind. Absolute mauling, 5 tests in a row, and West Indies weren't great but they were certainly "test class". West Indies destroyed England in 10 consecutive tests in 84 and 85, too.
Robertinho said:Here's a little joke that I found hilarious..
'A seven-year-old boy was at the centre of a courtroom drama today when he challenged a court ruling over who should have custody of him.
'The boy has a history of being beaten by his parents and the judge awarded custody to his aunt. The boy however confirmed that his aunt beat him more than his parents, and refused to live there. When the judge suggested that he live with his grandparents the boy cried out that they beat him more than anyone.
'Then in an unprecedented move, the judge dramatically allowed the boy to choose who should have custody of him...
In a final ruling , custody was granted to the English cricket team as the boy firmly believes that they are not capable of beating anyone.'
the boy is australian right?Robertinho said:In a final ruling , custody was granted to the English cricket team as the boy firmly believes that they are not capable of beating anyone.'
i think i will make the effort to remember this post and bring it back up again after the ashes.Robertinho said:Here's a little joke that I found hilarious..
'A seven-year-old boy was at the centre of a courtroom drama today when he challenged a court ruling over who should have custody of him.
'The boy has a history of being beaten by his parents and the judge awarded custody to his aunt. The boy however confirmed that his aunt beat him more than his parents, and refused to live there. When the judge suggested that he live with his grandparents the boy cried out that they beat him more than anyone.
'Then in an unprecedented move, the judge dramatically allowed the boy to choose who should have custody of him...
In a final ruling , custody was granted to the English cricket team as the boy firmly believes that they are not capable of beating anyone.'
its actually neither funny or good. far from greatcameeel said:Ha thats great!
Really? They took his brain away at birth? How awful.superkingdave said:the boy is australian right?
Link said:its actually neither funny or good. far from great