Despite him having a strike rate of almost 75? He thoroughly dominated Michael Clarke and Brad Hogg, and scored respectably against the seamers too.Dont think his recent innings can be classified as genius........its more perspiration on display than inspiration.
He does not destroy an attack like the tendulkar of old..........he sorta just tries to wear them down.
Very good cricket, but not genius.
Most test class batsmen could dominate Clarke & Hogg I'd say...Despite him having a strike rate of almost 75? He thoroughly dominated Michael Clarke and Brad Hogg, and scored respectably against the seamers too.
My point is that he hardly ground out his runs at a strike rate of 40 or something. He scored more runs against those two than balls he faced and he picked of Mitchell Johnson pretty easily too. Brett Lee was the only bowler he was relatively slow against, scoring at about 50 runs per hundred balls faced, but even then, that's not 'slow' by any means.Most test class batsmen could dominate Clarke & Hogg I'd say...
The season is 2007/08, not 2003/04.Dont think his recent innings can be classified as genius........its more perspiration on display than inspiration.
He does not destroy an attack like the tendulkar of old..........he sorta just tries to wear them down.
Very good cricket, but not genius.
One swallow does not a summer make.The season is 2007/08, not 2003/04.
Tendulkar batted quite aggressively this series. Happen to see that over against Mitchell Johnson in Adelaide?
That's largely true, but it's still very admirable and shows another side of his greatness as a player. He seemed, to me at least who doesn't see as much of him all the time as others have in recent years, more assured this tour than he had been for a while.One swallow does not a summer make.
The Tendulkar of old used to decimate bowlers of the class of Warne & Co. They used to fear him. That was sheer genius. Now he is simply working very hard.