Kirkut
International Regular
LMAO 150 mph bowling is extraterrestrial stuff.86-95 is a way away from 150
LMAO 150 mph bowling is extraterrestrial stuff.86-95 is a way away from 150
Never got the opportunity to watch Starc at his quickest but Johnson in 2013 and 2014 was the closest thing to Akhtar, arguably looked more frightening than Donald as well.Wasn't that during Taylor's 290? I recall Starc bowling some SERIOUS heat during that. Was an absolute road but it really made a great 30 minute passage of play with two set batsman (Taylor and Williamson, and later after Kane got out McCullum) vs a new ball and a Starc that was on absolute fire.
I'm pretty sure Taylor got dropped during it.
Shoaib was no where as frightening as West Indies bowlers. He was quicker than all of them. But he was more of a bowler who pitched it up and threatened pads and stumps. Malinga at hsi pomp was as quick as Starc and bit quicker than Johnson, but once again he was a pitch up bowler. The most frigtening bowler i seen in 90s was Brett Schultz. In 2000s it was Steven Harmison. In 2010s it was Morne Morkel. All were yard slower than Lee or Akthar. But much notorious to handle.Never got the opportunity to watch Starc at his quickest but Johnson in 2013 and 2014 was the closest thing to Akhtar, arguably looked more frightening than Donald as well.
heh I could see Shoaib on something but one look at Brett Lee should tell you he was never on steroidsI wonder how closely PED's and steriod are monitored in cricket or atleast during that time period .Shoaib and Lee were making their mark in the same era when Barry Bonds and company were getting crazy numbers with steriods help I would not be surprised if some cricketers were using some enhancements aswell.
I remember reading it was because they were measuring from some way down the pitch in NZ, compared to the standard of at or near release. I don't think it would be that easy to produce an average.I do remember in the early days of speed guns there was a huge discrepancy between speeds taken in Australia and in New Zealand when the same players were bowling. Australian guns were consistently reading about 10-15 km higher. I think it was Ian Smith on comms who said Australian speed guns were designed to read speed from the hand, while New Zealand reporting was based on average speed across 22 yards. I am not sure which of those approaches has become the default.
Edit: I got some of the details wrong, but there is a bit of coverage here: https://www.nzherald.co.nz/sport/mi...nology-questioned/VTMG4UKB62IEJ6YJPBCN4DRXBI/
Not all peds make you gain muscle though do they? I don't actually knowheh I could see Shoaib on something but one look at Brett Lee should tell you he was never on steroids
would really help fast bowling anyway the leaner you are the better
of course notNot all peds make you gain muscle though do they? I don't actually know
Archer loses pace at test level. Even when he toured India didn't bowl in excess of 90mph most of the time. I think Wood was rapid throughout.I remember reading it was because they were measuring from some way down the pitch in NZ, compared to the standard of at or near release. I don't think it would be that easy to produce an average.
Jofra Archer thinks speedguns in NZ still read low lol.
Didn't Shoaib fail a drugs test too?heh I could see Shoaib on something but one look at Brett Lee should tell you he was never on steroids
would really help fast bowling anyway the leaner you are the better
Shoaib was proper 95+ even in his debut. And he was not the only one to be of that pace bracket from Pakistan. Mohammed Zahid and later Mohammed Sami were as quick as Akthar. Moahmmed Akram was not far behind. He split the thigh pad of Chandika Hathurusinghe in the 95-96 tour. All of them were very lean, and were frighteningly quick too.heh I could see Shoaib on something but one look at Brett Lee should tell you he was never on steroids
would really help fast bowling anyway the leaner you are the better