• Welcome to the Cricket Web forums, one of the biggest forums in the world dedicated to cricket.

    You are currently viewing our boards as a guest which gives you limited access to view most discussions and access our other features. By joining our free community you will have access to post topics, respond to polls, upload content and access many other special features. Registration is fast, simple and absolutely free so please, join the Cricket Web community today!

    If you have any problems with the registration process or your account login, please contact us.

Overused terms in cricket journalism/writing/punditry

Starfighter

Cricket Web: All-Time Legend
Granted, this does probably go more for sports writing in general, but being only interested in cricket, a couple I've noticed:

Star: any cricketer who's ever appeared on television is a 'star'. Now I suppose that is further than 99.9% of cricketers, but are Joe Mennie and Peter Haztoglou really cricket stars? How many ordinary people could name them the week after seeing a match with them? It's like they needed a default word and thought 'cricketer' wouldn't do. Biggest offender is Fox Sports by far.

Famous: any somewhat unexpected victory, especially an upset, is 'famous'. Most recently applied to last night's Bangladesh vs Scotland match. Let's see if it's still remembered in a year's time (or more) before calling it 'famous'. A better word is 'remarkable' or similar.
 
Last edited:

Teja.

Global Moderator
Genius has to be biggest. It's almost never used correctly (if a bit hypoerbolically) for triumphs of strategy or out-of-the-box thinking but is used for the successful execution of brute force guaranteed triumphs such as the ball which turns more than expected to get a wicket or an unplayable 150 kph yorker which splits a batsman open.
 

NotMcKenzie

International Debutant
Star: any cricketer who's ever appeared on television is a 'star'. Now I suppose that is further than 99.9% of cricketers, but are Joe Mennie and Peter Haztoglou really cricket stars? How many ordinary people could name them the week after seeing a match with them? It's like they needed a default word and thought 'cricketer' wouldn't do. Biggest offender is Fox Sports by far.
To be fair to the television in people, in the case of those who play for the better Melbourne Big Bash team, they are a 'Star'.
 

Chubb

International Regular
Jarrod Kimber. Writing all his articles. In really short sentences.

English cricket journalists panicking and writing we're-all-doomed pieces every time England lose a game (or even just lose a wicket ).

I would add, I used to be a journalist and I have been in the press box during a "humiliating" England defeat and they really do all line up to write the most negative, catastrophising story possible.
 

anil1405

International Captain
I was thinking about these overrated jargons yesterday when Anjum Chopra called Mahedi Hasan a great All-Rounder. I mean I don't know if she even got Mahedi Hasan and Mehadi Hasan Miraz mixed up but either way none of them are great ARs anyway. Them being called ARs itself is questionable.
 

_00_deathscar

International Regular
Genius has to be biggest. It's almost never used correctly (if a bit hypoerbolically) for triumphs of strategy or out-of-the-box thinking but is used for the successful execution of brute force guaranteed triumphs such as the ball which turns more than expected to get a wicket or an unplayable 150 kph yorker which splits a batsman open.
Best one I’ve seen in very recent times was the genius ball from Bumrah to Ollie Robinson.
 

RossTaylorsBox

Cricket Web: All-Time Legend
Do writers still use "nicking off"? I'd never heard anyone use that when I was a kid and then all of a sudden people kept saying it.
 

BoyBrumby

Englishman
Pretty common in England many years ago
With our top order nicking off is still quite in vogue, tbf.

Warne, although one hesitates slightly to call him a pundit, is very fond of "natural variation" to describe the spinner's break that doesn't turn.
 

Top