-
Welcome to the Cricket Web forums, one of the biggest forums in the world dedicated to cricket.
You are currently viewing our boards as a guest which gives you limited access to view most discussions and access our other features. By joining our free community you will have access to post topics, respond to polls, upload content and access many other special features. Registration is fast, simple and absolutely free so please, join the Cricket Web community today!
If you have any problems with the registration process or your account login, please contact us.
***Official*** South Africa in Australia 2012
- Thread starter Spark
- Start date
Spikey
Request Your Custom Title Now!
just about stand by this tbh.
not based on cricketing reasons obv. chip on my shoulder and all that
Prince EWS
Global Moderator
That was before he came out and said the Barmy Army hurt his feelings though. That was ridiculous. I marked him never to play again at that moment.
Cabinet96
Global Moderator
Well, you don't, but you're still tasting in some form or another.
Edit: Beaten FFS.
Spark
Global Moderator
Haha yeah, way beyond self-parody.
Spikey
Request Your Custom Title Now!
Australia v South Africa, 3rd Test, Perth : To sub, or not to sub? | Cricket Features | Australia v South Africa | ESPN Cricinfo
You know, I don't mind the idea of a sub in the shield cricket, but not actually for the reasons in there. Given the shield is more and more 'just' a reserves comp, the problem of a bowling breaking down and a batsman knocking up a ton that has a question mark hanging over it is, well, more of a problem. So I wouldn't mind it from that perspective. def. don't support it in test cricket tho.
You know, I don't mind the idea of a sub in the shield cricket, but not actually for the reasons in there. Given the shield is more and more 'just' a reserves comp, the problem of a bowling breaking down and a batsman knocking up a ton that has a question mark hanging over it is, well, more of a problem. So I wouldn't mind it from that perspective. def. don't support it in test cricket tho.
flibbertyjibber
Request Your Custom Title Now!
You can't have subs as you would get sides abusing it by having fake injuries to get another spinner involved if the pitch turns and so on.
Burgey
Request Your Custom Title Now!
WRT subs, the ICC could have a panel of doctors in all of its host countries. When a player is injured in a situation like Kallis has been, the local panel members could look at his scans or medical reports and overnight give a yay or nay to any proposed substitute.
My own view is it's a sad part of the game that players get injured in the course of FC or test matches, and teams need to deal with it. But then again, it's now a professional sport and livelihoods of team mates can be at stake if a side which loses a player loses a match instead of drawing one, or even winning. It's a vexed question. I think the easiest way is to maintain the status quo, but it's not really satisfactory either.
My own view is it's a sad part of the game that players get injured in the course of FC or test matches, and teams need to deal with it. But then again, it's now a professional sport and livelihoods of team mates can be at stake if a side which loses a player loses a match instead of drawing one, or even winning. It's a vexed question. I think the easiest way is to maintain the status quo, but it's not really satisfactory either.
Justo
U19 Debutant
I'd personally allow replacements for genuine injuries but make it based on innings. I'd also make it that replacements have to be determined before the match E.G. each team has a 15 man squad. Replacement A is able to replace 1-6 in the batting line up, replacement B is able to replace the wicket keeper and replacement C is able to replace a bowler in the event of injury.
I would only allow the replacements to come in at the start of the 3rd innings. This could mean that a team might have to bowl or bat in the first and second innings down a player but for the third and fourth innings they'd be back to full strength. This avoids the possibility of fresh bowlers/batsmen coming in mid innings while still ensuring that teams are able to be competitive.
Replacements also would need to be approved by the umpires and/or medical staff. Obviously things like cramps etc wouldn't warrant a replacement. Only genuine injuries/illness being the cause for replacement.
I would only allow the replacements to come in at the start of the 3rd innings. This could mean that a team might have to bowl or bat in the first and second innings down a player but for the third and fourth innings they'd be back to full strength. This avoids the possibility of fresh bowlers/batsmen coming in mid innings while still ensuring that teams are able to be competitive.
Replacements also would need to be approved by the umpires and/or medical staff. Obviously things like cramps etc wouldn't warrant a replacement. Only genuine injuries/illness being the cause for replacement.
benchmark00
Request Your Custom Title Now!
Substitute? You bishs cray?
Runners is a tricky one, they definitely should have them in theory, but in practice it's impossible to police, even with an independent doctor/trained medical professional. Say a bloke goes down with cramp (which is generally seen as conditioning, not injury), what's stopping the player from saying it's actually a torn muscle? They can't stop the game and get scans and then give him a runner if he has torn his calf.
Maybe if they have a rule where once you start your innings, if you get injured you can't have a runner, but if you sustain an injury before you go out to bat during the course of the match, then if it's tested and seen to be an injury, you're allowed a runner.
Runners is a tricky one, they definitely should have them in theory, but in practice it's impossible to police, even with an independent doctor/trained medical professional. Say a bloke goes down with cramp (which is generally seen as conditioning, not injury), what's stopping the player from saying it's actually a torn muscle? They can't stop the game and get scans and then give him a runner if he has torn his calf.
Maybe if they have a rule where once you start your innings, if you get injured you can't have a runner, but if you sustain an injury before you go out to bat during the course of the match, then if it's tested and seen to be an injury, you're allowed a runner.
benchmark00
Request Your Custom Title Now!
Ponting set to announce retirement today.