• Welcome to the Cricket Web forums, one of the biggest forums in the world dedicated to cricket.

    You are currently viewing our boards as a guest which gives you limited access to view most discussions and access our other features. By joining our free community you will have access to post topics, respond to polls, upload content and access many other special features. Registration is fast, simple and absolutely free so please, join the Cricket Web community today!

    If you have any problems with the registration process or your account login, please contact us.

*Official* Second Test at Lord's

Furball

Evil Scotsman
I don't think you can use a piece of technology when it is only definitive in one direction. If the on field decision is out it is basically impossible to successfully review if no hotspot mark is not evidence of no edge and its the primary piece of tech to find an edge.

At least bring snicko into it.
Nah this is stupid. Hotspot is definitely useful and definitely worth having as long as you remember its limitations.
 

Bahnz

Hall of Fame Member
I don't think you can use a piece of technology when it is only definitive in one direction. If the on field decision is out it is basically impossible to successfully review if no hotspot mark is not evidence of no edge and its the primary piece of tech to find an edge.

At least bring snicko into it.
No it's not, there just needs to be some other evidence that the batsman didn't hit it (e.g. Bat hitting ground, camera showing gap between bat and ball etc).
 

91Jmay

International Coach
So what, since there was nothing on the hot-spot that decision should have been overturned, that's how the system should work, going into this whole snicko, sound or deflection business opens up a grey area which nobody wants.
You clearly lack a basic understanding of conclusive proof. If the decision is out all the 3rd ump needs is any evidence to back it up for it to stand. Hill heard a clear edge so he UPHELD the original decision. Simple.
 

Furball

Evil Scotsman
If Khawaja had been given out to the one England reviewed just before his dismissal then I reckon that would have been overturned.
 

FaaipDeOiad

Hall of Fame Member
You clearly lack a basic understanding of conclusive proof. If the decision is out all the 3rd ump needs is any evidence to back it up for it to stand. Hill heard a clear edge so he UPHELD the original decision. Simple.
Are you talking about the agar dismissal? He was given not out on the field.
 

luckyeddie

Cricket Web Staff Member
Not a terrible call by the umpire at all - no sympathy for any idiot who pads up to a ball pitching middle and leg. It might have missed leg by the thickness of a rizla, but Haddin made a huge error of judgement.
 

Top