biased indian
International Coach
the bowling one or the batting oneJASON said:Now all he needs to do, is to work on getting his career average over 50 !!![]()
![]()

the bowling one or the batting oneJASON said:Now all he needs to do, is to work on getting his career average over 50 !!![]()
![]()
haha, that was awesome! How's the slog-sweep? Is it true both Waughs told McGrath they'd give him $5000 each if he ever made a test 50?Mr Casson said:To Steve Waugh: WHAT HAVE YOU DONE TO OUR NOTORIOUS BATTING BUNNY??
You've created a monster!!
The guy is batting unbelievably. He played a shot to go from 107 to 111 that was some sort of straight pull on the up over mid-on for 6 to a ball a foot or so wide of off stump - amazing stuff.Slow Love™ said:Watching it, you just knew he was going to do it, too. Having said that, I'm not sure that a short one was the ideal delivery to bowl to him at that stage. Clarke's feats so far are one of the best examples of "silencing the doubters" I think I've seen for a long time.
In the Cricket Show just now, they were describing his performance against India as being as "sweet as a rich, buttered chicken". Mmmmmm....![]()
I have a couple of playing shirts signed by Clarke and the rest of the NSW team, might be haning onto those for a while hahaJono said:Haha I was thinking that was quite quick. Mind you, anyone who purchases that may be quite smart. If Clarke has anywhere near a career that his potential can give him, that'll be worth a hell of a lot of money by the end of it.
thanks mate, good stuff.Hoggy31 said:I've created this little package for everyone who missed McGrath's 50
nah - McGrath is a genuine #11 as much as Martin is for NZL..............that performance to let him do what he has is just bloody pathetic..............I can accept the top & middle order doing it to us but to allow the AUS tail (which is genuine #10 & 11) to do so is deserving of total derision........what's the point in us batting down to #10 if we are going to let the opposition #11 outscore our own lauded lower order / tail?????Isolator said:Just to show I'm a hardened NZ "supporter", I was not even slightly surprised by McGrath's 50. Nor frustrated. Seems I've got used to such things.
I agree re the short pitched deliveries - what made it even worse was to see Mills pitching it short when he's supposedly a swing bowler & would need to be pitching it up on a good length to get the bloody thing to swing in the first place..............Isolator said:Anyway, how many NZers or others feel that bowling too short is their problem? I've noticed it for a long time now...personally, I'd rather see them pitch everything up, even if they get driven for four repeatedly. Martin, especially, I don't know what he's pitching short for. Full is the natural length for him, or at least it seemed so vs. SA.
Next, what about tomorrow? Today's probably been pretty horrible for the NZ players and they must want to get it behind them, so I think the best thing Ponting could do is let MG and Gillespie carry on for a while tomorrow. If they can make anther 20-odd runs, NZ would be mentally destroyed for the whole day, I think.
Based on what?Slats4ever said:hehe NZ so are the second best in the world...
Go on marc make us laugh and say england is second.marc71178 said:Based on what?
I'd say the likes of Hobbs and Sutcliffe as well (and add Boycott)FaaipDeOiad said:I think very highly of Langer, but Sunil Gavaskar was a better opener.
Because he is better than flintoff.marc71178 said:I'd say the likes of Hobbs and Sutcliffe as well (and add Boycott)
If Langer is so good, how come he's only ranked 1 space ahead of Andrew Flintoff at the moment and has never even been in the top 6?
Well, that's what the ICC ratings say, and I will point out that we beat them 3-0 not so long ago.Scallywag said:Go on marc make us laugh and say england is second.
Scallywag said:Because he is better than flintoff.
You know marc that picture of mo really suits you.marc71178 said:Well, that's what the ICC ratings say, and I will point out that we beat them 3-0 not so long ago.
It really bugs you that Langer would be the best batsman in the england team if he was unfortunate enough to play for them.marc71178 said:1 whole place (!)
Did you not read what I put?
For someone who you allege to be so good, you fail to realise his ranking is so low, and he has NEVER even been one of the top 6 batsmen in the world.
A good player, but by no means a great.
When I see mo answer the phone and barts on the other end I think of you marc.marc71178 said:And what do you mean by that?
.