dontcloseyoureyes
BARNES OUT
Very strong 0-0 vibes here.
-
Welcome to the Cricket Web forums, one of the biggest forums in the world dedicated to cricket.
You are currently viewing our boards as a guest which gives you limited access to view most discussions and access our other features. By joining our free community you will have access to post topics, respond to polls, upload content and access many other special features. Registration is fast, simple and absolutely free so please, join the Cricket Web community today!
If you have any problems with the registration process or your account login, please contact us.
***Official*** English Football Season 2018-19
- Thread starter GIMH
- Start date
dontcloseyoureyes
BARNES OUT
I screamed so loud. Unbelievable.
Cabinet96
Global Moderator
I was ready to laugh at how stupid he was for shooting
Tom Halsey
International Coach
There haven't really been any twists and turns since Liverpool stopped dropping points a couple of months ago, though. Both teams have come close-ish to dropping points, but they haven't. A classic title race doesn't have both teams just winning every week, IMO, as nothing changes.
sledger
Spanish_Vicente
It's because like I have said all along. It has been obvious since the very off that City would win. It has never been in doubt.
Lillian Thomson
Hall of Fame Member
The ideal scenario would be for Anfield to be all hyped up in expectation and for City to then be 3-0 up in 20 minutes. Or perhaps City winning in a similar way to the way they did against QPR. United had won the title so often that it wasn't as funny as it would be to deny Liverpool.
vcs
Request Your Custom Title Now!
Both teams have been amazing in the way they have dealt with pressure.
On one hand, Liverpool have built their team (relatively) organically, proved near impossible to beat, and shown great resilience to score numerous late winners. Then again, City have had to cope with going all the way in both domestic cups, got knocked out by a hair's breadth in the CL and have still managed to chase down and keep pace with Liverpool. Will be incredibly harsh on whoever falls short.
On one hand, Liverpool have built their team (relatively) organically, proved near impossible to beat, and shown great resilience to score numerous late winners. Then again, City have had to cope with going all the way in both domestic cups, got knocked out by a hair's breadth in the CL and have still managed to chase down and keep pace with Liverpool. Will be incredibly harsh on whoever falls short.
dontcloseyoureyes
BARNES OUT
vcs
Request Your Custom Title Now!
Not thrown as much cash at it as some of the others
dontcloseyoureyes
BARNES OUT
Liverpool have two academy players in their squad, of which one plays with regularity. They've spent over 400 million in 3 seasons. Barca paying 3x what Coutinho was worth doesn't turn their spending into organic building.
The only club in the top 6 who's got an argument for having been built "organically" is Tottenham, and that's only because Levy is a tightarse.
The only club in the top 6 who's got an argument for having been built "organically" is Tottenham, and that's only because Levy is a tightarse.
andmark
International Captain
I broadly agree, but you're exaggerating the Liverpool spending figure quite significantly. In the past five years, Liverpool's net spend was £-193.58m. That's fifth of the top six and less than half what City and United spent in that time.
dontcloseyoureyes
BARNES OUT
I'm not talking about net spend. Net spend isnt particularly relevant in this, especially when you sold one player for 135m and he wasn't in any way a homegrown player.
The fact is that they've spent 435m on buying new players in the last 3 seasons. It's a similar amount to Chelsea and behind only United and City.
The fact is that they've spent 435m on buying new players in the last 3 seasons. It's a similar amount to Chelsea and behind only United and City.
Last edited: