Recklesness I suppose...The Pakistan cricket team is so dire, it's so frustrating because they have the talent and ability yet they still play like ****. Most annoying team in the world, even Bangers is getting on with business (182/2)
One wonders...I wonder, are UAE going in with eight part-timers masquerading as bowlers? That's a rather weak attack! They seem loaded with a bits-and-pieces brigade. Totally forgot about the stronger group. Good show by Ashraful and Raqibul here.
That's what I thought .No, I m not .... I m just posting meaningless one-liners w/o having a clue to kill my time.
yeah, why would a tournament that been held since 1984 and which involves top cricket playing countries of a continent be important
that what happens when you judge ppl with your kind of IQThat's what I thought .
'only 3' is a dumb thing to say as most regular ODI tournaments are tri-seriesSo what are the Asia Cup Moments of History ? Top playing countries from continent means nothing because that mean only 3.
Go on attacking me, first step of losing the argument.that what happens when you judge ppl with your kind of IQ
And we do not call those tri-series as TOP ODI series. Because with that logic, Tri Series in England/Australia have a much better history than Asia Cup.'only 3' is a dumb thing to say as most regular ODI tournaments are tri-series
Only two Asia cups had BD as Test nation. And no, it hasn't been taking place regularly as it was supposed to. Besides, could you share some piece of Asia Cup History for the benefit of us ?and Asia Cup has 4 test playing nations, thats roughly 40% of the total .... anyone who knows abt numbers would know what that means .... and it's been taking place regularly and has some history attached to it. But we do not call them great Tournaments, do we ?
CT is a useless tournament and Asia Cup is even more useless.and I m saying that it probably ranks after WC and CT in ODIs, which i guess is self-explanatory .... don't know why someone has to Q that
irrelevant post .... if its useless why are you following this threadGo on attacking me, first step of losing the argument.
And we do not call those tri-series as TOP ODI series. Because with that logic, Tri Series in England/Australia have a much better history than Asia Cup.
Only two Asia cups had BD as Test nation. And no, it hasn't been taking place regularly as it was supposed to. Besides, could you share some piece of Asia Cup History for the benefit of us ?
CT is a useless tournament and Asia Cup is even more useless.
Which one bowler? Do you mean Murali or Vaas or dilhara or maybe even Thushara:Sri Lanka has also struggled after their legends played their last and don't look a top team anymore- in fact, they're a one-bowler team more than ever now.
And then there's Ajantha Mendis and Sanath Jayasuriya even.Arjun said:Maharoof is out of the Asia Cup. His replacement, though a problem case, is quite effective on his day.
Sanz mate, you'd be better off just ignoring ret as it's plain to see he'd rather insult people than discuss cricket.
1. Clearly, doesn't seem to get the obviousOriginally Posted by Sanz
Go on attacking me, first step of losing the argument.
2. Ignores the fact that I rated CT, which is a comparatively newer tourney, higher than the Asia CupAnd we do not call those tri-series as TOP ODI series. Because with that logic, Tri Series in England/Australia have a much better history than Asia Cup.
3. if only two Asia Cup has BD as a test nation, doesn't imply that its not evolved into a 4 test nation tourney .... on timeframe, as i said by regularly, it doesn't imply that it has to be held every x number of years [though i would prefer every 4 years] .... on history, for the zillionth time 'since 1984' if it means anythingOnly two Asia cups had BD as Test nation. And no, it hasn't been taking place regularly as it was supposed to. Besides, could you share some piece of Asia Cup History for the benefit of us ?
4. an irrelevant personal opinion .... and i have no time to find out why he thinks thatCT is a useless tournament and Asia Cup is even more useless.