George.Hinton
Banned
Who do you think is a better test match batsman ?
A lot of Sehwag's runs have come on the back of dropped catches though, particularly against Pakistan, and he's played very few Test innings of note when confronted with something other than a road of a pitch.Actually looking forward to reading Richard's views on this one, seeing as they've both played in the same era, and one's average is significantly better than the others.
I dunno but I reckon he just had a bit of a purple patch. His Test average is a few runs better than his FC average and I think, after some regression to the mean, he's now where he should be. Really dones make those on here who rated him as one of England's best ever look a bit ridiculous, though.Vaughan's career has been a tad disappointing for mine.
Admittedly injuries haven't helped but I really think that for his talent, he should have better numbers than what he has.
First-chance average?A lot of Sehwag's runs have come on the back of dropped catches though, particularly against Pakistan, and he's played very few Test innings of note when confronted with something other than a road of a pitch.
I actually think it's pretty close, and I place less importance on such factors than Richard does, so I'm fairly sure he'll say Vaughan.
Not as much as Sehwag though.First-chance average?
Vaughan's benefitted from dropped chances though, as has every batsman.
Every batsman has the fortune of catches being dropped-hell the aussies won a world cup because of a dropped catch-I wouldnt consider it at all.Not as much as Sehwag though.
A lot of Sehwag's runs have come on the back of dropped catches though, particularly against Pakistan, and he's played very few Test innings of note when confronted with something other than a road of a pitch.
I actually think it's pretty close, and I place less importance on such factors than Richard does, so I'm fairly sure he'll say Vaughan.