Craig
World Traveller
And I never said that it was the case.marc71178 said:Yes, but it's by no means a World All Time attack, so in that sense it isn't that great.
And I never said that it was the case.marc71178 said:Yes, but it's by no means a World All Time attack, so in that sense it isn't that great.
I would agree.roseboy64 said:I think there's a case for Headley in the RHXI for B Richards.
dont see the need to have both lillee and hadlee....MoxPearl said:cant belive u all missing out hadlee D:!
I agree. Imran > Hadlee > Botham > Kapilmarc71178 said:Yes, deadly - Imran for me was far and away the best of the big 4 and IMO not that far off Sobers.
You, sir, have very little clue about the history of the sportimranrabb said:Who is Fred Trueman and Hobbs.Why the hell is Bradman in everyones list in the 1950s he was facing bowlers who bowl like bangladesh and if he was facing todays bowlers his average wouldnt be 99.9 but 9.99.Sachin Tendulkar are much better then Hobbs and Trueman.Waqar Younis is much better then Trueman
Wow, truly wow. I think we have a winner for the funniest post ever. I hope there is a good excuse for this one ( prefererably something to do with a frontal lobotomy).imranrabb said:Who is Fred Trueman and Hobbs.Why the hell is Bradman in everyones list in the 1950s he was facing bowlers who bowl like bangladesh and if he was facing todays bowlers his average wouldnt be 99.9 but 9.99.Sachin Tendulkar are much better then Hobbs and Trueman.Waqar Younis is much better then Trueman
When was this 1950/60marc71178 said:Fred Trueman?
One of t'greatest Fast Bowlers of all-time?
I tell you lad, ee weren't a bad bowler.
I was born in 1947 young man i know everythingNeil Pickup said:You, sir, have very little clue about the history of the sport
Time to dust off the sign, methinks.
In what way?marc71178 said:That's stretching it more than a little...
And I thought that I was CricketWeb's senile ignoramus, but I gladly hand over my crown.imranrabb said:I was born in 1947 young man i know everything