SillyCowCorner1
Moooo
CricketWeb forum’s experts have made their decision.Wow didn't realise Pollock is this overrated.
Kapil can’t match the greatest Pollock
CricketWeb forum’s experts have made their decision.Wow didn't realise Pollock is this overrated.
They have an equal WC record. Also, Shami is even more WC reliant for his record.I don't care about team trophies much, especially when Shami has a better WC record.
And can he bat? The guy avgs 12 with a SR of 77. It's not even as if he's pinch hitting.
Shami's record is better against top teams.They have an equal WC record. Also, Shami is even more WC reliant for his record.
Hata wasn't that great. Lack of consistency.Jayasuriya is easily better ODI player than Akram.
Both are among the greatest. You can’t say Jaya is easily better. I doubt he actually is better overall also. Wasim was the standout in 1992 WC Finals and went on to pick 500 ODI wickets. Probably the record of most wickets by pacer that will remain unbeaten.Jayasuriya is easily better ODI player than Akram. There's nothing much seperating Akram, Murali, McGrath and Garner with the ball too.
Top 20
Richards
Jayasuriya
Tendulkar
Pollock
Kapil
Klusener
Kohli
de Villiers
Dhoni
McGrath
Murali
Garner
Akram
Lee
Starc
Bumrah
Bevan
Sharma
Jones
Saqlain
Jayasuriya scored 13000 runs and took 300 wickets. That is probably not going to get broken too. He is a better ODI cricketer easily. Destructive batsman, very versatile spinner who was one of the first spinners to bowl in death, ATG fieldsman and a very good captain. Way too much for Akram to cover with his superior bowling abilities.Both are among the greatest. You can’t say Jaya is easily better. I doubt he actually is better overall also. Wasim was the standout in 1992 WC Finals and went on to pick 500 ODI wickets. Probably the record of most wickets by pacer that will remain unbeaten.
Folks thinking that Folks having Pollock in their top five ODI players is crazy is crazy.Folks having Pollock in their top five ODI players is crazy.
Jayasuriya achieved this longevity feat in 440 matches. Wasim did in 359.Jayasuriya scored 13000 runs and took 300 wickets. That is probably not going to get broken too. He is a better ODI cricketer easily. Destructive batsman, very versatile spinner who was one of the first spinners to bowl in death, ATG fieldsman and a very good captain. Way too much for Akram to cover with his superior bowling abilities.
Batting equivalent of 300 wickets is 6000 runs. Players who have achieved that double:Jayasuriya scored 13000 runs and took 300 wickets.
Jayasuriya achieved longevity because he was disciplined and fit. Wasim played for 19 years and Jayasuriya for 20. Nothing much between them in longevity. Jayasuriya managed such a stellar fitness record, other than for a freak injury or two, never missed a match.Jayasuriya achieved this longevity feat in 440 matches. Wasim did in 359.
Wasim was a capable hitter too whose batting became pivotal in winning Pakistan the WC final in 1992 and was a good captain too.