• Welcome to the Cricket Web forums, one of the biggest forums in the world dedicated to cricket.

    You are currently viewing our boards as a guest which gives you limited access to view most discussions and access our other features. By joining our free community you will have access to post topics, respond to polls, upload content and access many other special features. Registration is fast, simple and absolutely free so please, join the Cricket Web community today!

    If you have any problems with the registration process or your account login, please contact us.

Jonbrooks chucking Megathread

cnerd123

likes this
Murali's action for the most part looks just fine. In fact it is a lot better than some of the bowlers out there. It's only certain deliveries when his action changes completely e.g. big off break and doosra.
FTR this is all rubbish too. He was called for his standard offbreak.
 

jonbrooks

International Debutant
FTR this is all rubbish too. He was called for his standard offbreak.
Which is where all the confusion is. I've never, ever had an issue with murali's action. Watch him side on, front on or whatever and for the majority of his deliveries he is fine. There is no optical illusion, birth defect, or any of that other nonsense. He looks like a normal spin bowler until he starts delivering his effort balls. Then his action changes completely.
 

cnerd123

likes this
Which is where all the confusion is. I've never, ever had an issue with murali's action. Watch him side on, front on or whatever and for the majority of his deliveries he is fine. There is no optical illusion, birth defect, or any of that other nonsense. He looks like a normal spin bowler until he starts delivering his effort balls. Then his action changes completely.
Nope. Literally not true unless you define the words "changes" and/or "completely" differently to everyone else.
 

Daemon

Request Your Custom Title Now!
Which is where all the confusion is. I've never, ever had an issue with murali's action. Watch him side on, front on or whatever and for the majority of his deliveries he is fine. There is no optical illusion, birth defect, or any of that other nonsense. He looks like a normal spin bowler until he starts delivering his effort balls. Then his action changes completely.
He looks anything but normal no matter what he delivers
 

Migara

Cricketer Of The Year
Which is where all the confusion is. I've never, ever had an issue with murali's action. Watch him side on, front on or whatever and for the majority of his deliveries he is fine. There is no optical illusion, birth defect, or any of that other nonsense. He looks like a normal spin bowler until he starts delivering his effort balls. Then his action changes completely.
What actually is an effort ball?
 

Top