SillyCowCorner1
Request Your Custom Title Now!
Battle of SLAs.
If you know a better SLA, please inlude him.
Herath- 433 wickets at 28.08. SR-60.03
Shakib- 210 wickets at 31.13. SR- 62.00
Jadeja- 214 wickets at 24.63. SR- 60.62
Saunders- 79 wickets at 22.83. SR- 45.13
Although Saunders's sample of matches is small, he did pose himself as a threat. The strike-rate is impressive.
Herath comes up as a monster, we all know what he can do.
Shakib, being from a weaker test nation, and with the highest average in this analysis have a strike rate that is similar to Herath and Jadeja, which is spectacular.
Is Jadeja the better bowler because he is from a better team then?
If you know a better SLA, please inlude him.
Herath- 433 wickets at 28.08. SR-60.03
Shakib- 210 wickets at 31.13. SR- 62.00
Jadeja- 214 wickets at 24.63. SR- 60.62
Saunders- 79 wickets at 22.83. SR- 45.13
Although Saunders's sample of matches is small, he did pose himself as a threat. The strike-rate is impressive.
Herath comes up as a monster, we all know what he can do.
Shakib, being from a weaker test nation, and with the highest average in this analysis have a strike rate that is similar to Herath and Jadeja, which is spectacular.
Is Jadeja the better bowler because he is from a better team then?