Richard
Cricket Web Staff Member
I couldn't. I was saying throughout 2001/02, and 2002/03, "WTF are they ignoring Campbell for?" It was patently obvious to me that Hinds and Ganga were being ruined by being repeatedly forced to open and I was always dead-set against it.Regardless of poor selections after Sherwin Campbell's dropping from the Test side in 2002; the West Indian selectors where perfectly justified to seek a replacement for Campbell.
The occasional flashes of brilliance displayed by Campbell had long disappeared into a sustained period of terrible form. Over two years and 17 Tests had passed since Campbell's last century. Offset only by a couple decent innings (82 at Lords, and dual half-centuries in Sydney). West Indies had two very promising young batsman in Hinds and Ganga ready for selection, and in hindsight, yes a poor move forcing them to open, but at the time you can understand why they passed on Campbell.
Campbell and Gayle should have opened together for a number of years.
Truth be told I've never truly examined Campbell's Barbados form post-axing (I will be doing sometime soon, for reasons that will become clear in a year or so). However, it should be noted that an injury in 2001, which kept him out of the series against South Africa, was the initial note on which he was excluded.Never any guarantee that Campbell would have produced one of his fine innings again. Went back to Barbados and produced a couple of decent seasons, but I don't think the selectors would ever have gone back to him.