Yes, that's impressiv,e but they then did sod-all else for the rest of the game, and had to rely on Milan missing a guilt-edged chance right at the end to even reach the luck of the penalties - they didn't even win outright.
Why would you possibly spell it with a "u", as in culpability... "gilt" - as in gold leaf...
You might want to sort out the grocer's apostrophe in the thread title too.
Sorry Mr. Pickup.
Who cares? Everyone knew what he was trying to say.
India v Australia at Kolkata where Dravid and Laxman bat for a lifetime (ok a whole day) to beat Australia after following on and trailing by 271 runs and looked a certain defeat considering Australia had won 16 on the trot then. Dodgy umpiring though when Australia batted.
Topped it off by seeing Slater, Langer, Ponting and Hayden bowl
http://aus.cricinfo.com/link_to_dat...N_IND/SCORECARDS/AUS_IND_T2_11-15MAR2001.html
Yeah forgot that one, that has to be up there.
Yeah, I generally rate the ones with 2 goals in stoppage time higher though - they're very rare. It basically requires scoring and going straight up the other end from the kick off and scoring again.
Ha, ha! I see where you're going with this. Who's your club team, Thomas? I forget.
Haha, yeah, maybe bias, but still, 2 goals in 3 (technically roughly 2:30 from when Sheringham's crossed the line) minutes > 3 goals in longer (no idea in what timespan the German goals came in, know it wasn't long, but was longer than 3 minutes).Ha, ha! I see where you're going with this. Who's your club team, Thomas? I forget.
I guess you can make a case for it on a "victory from jaws of defeat" vibe, but England 1970>>>>>>>>>>England 2004 & the WC last 8 more important than a group game in the European Nations.
