• Welcome to the Cricket Web forums, one of the biggest forums in the world dedicated to cricket.

    You are currently viewing our boards as a guest which gives you limited access to view most discussions and access our other features. By joining our free community you will have access to post topics, respond to polls, upload content and access many other special features. Registration is fast, simple and absolutely free so please, join the Cricket Web community today!

    If you have any problems with the registration process or your account login, please contact us.

Flintoff was drunk

Burgey

Request Your Custom Title Now!
Not sure of the exact terminology but if it takes over your professional life then it is a problem.
AWTA - you can have a problem with grog, in how it affects your behaviour, and not be an alcoholic.
 

Perm

Cricket Web: All-Time Legend
Why are people so intent on criticising Duncan Fletcher? Quite pathetic really.
 

Stapel

International Regular
Why are people so intent on criticising Duncan Fletcher? Quite pathetic really.
As Geoff Boycott said: Fletcher took the moral high ground by claiming 'nasty' details should not be uncovered in the media.

Apart from that, he appears to have made Flintoff captain, because he was hoping that might make him more aware of his responsibilities and thus might prevent him from getting drunk a few times during the tour.
I find that an unbelievable stupid reason to make someone captain.....

Furthermore, I don't think that a few drinking sessions are really that bad. Of course, being drunk in the morning training session is no good thing, but in the end it only effects this one training session.
 

ohtani's jacket

State Vice-Captain
We had this argument at the time about Flintoff's drinking... I think you'll find that the medical definition of a drinking problem and indeed alcoholism is not as lenient as people who think Flintoff's a good lad. And who's to say that Flintoff isn't addicted to alcohol?
 

Perm

Cricket Web: All-Time Legend
But then it's not "pathetic" if those insulted want to hit back. In fact it'll probably help sell the book more.
I don't have any problem with Flintoff trying to defend himself. I've no idea how he could possibly do it, because the antics he got up to are inexcuseable in my books, but he can still try. I just think it's pathetic how people are criticising Fletcher for revealing the truths, but I get the feeling if the player involved was less loved and not as important to England, then people would be sharpening the knives.
 

Lillian Thomson

Hall of Fame Member
I don't have any problem with Flintoff trying to defend himself. I've no idea how he could possibly do it, because the antics he got up to are inexcuseable in my books, but he can still try. I just think it's pathetic how people are criticising Fletcher for revealing the truths, but I get the feeling if the player involved was less loved and not as important to England, then people would be sharpening the knives.

Freddie hasn't replied yet, it'll be interesting to see what he has to say at some time. It's Boycott and Botham who have hit back.
 

Perm

Cricket Web: All-Time Legend
Freddie hasn't replied yet, it'll be interesting to see what he has to say at some time. It's Boycott and Botham who have hit back.
I wouldn't be overly interested in what Flintoff says anyway. As I said previously, being drunk at a practice isn't acceptable, especially for the team captain. I can see where Boycott is coming from, but he usually has a fair few negative things to say about everything.
 

Richard

Cricket Web Staff Member
We had this argument at the time about Flintoff's drinking... I think you'll find that the medical definition of a drinking problem and indeed alcoholism is not as lenient as people who think Flintoff's a good lad. And who's to say that Flintoff isn't addicted to alcohol?
Equally, who the blazes is to say he is unless they know one hell of a lot more than anyone on here is likely to know?

All we know yet is that Flintoff was irresponsible with a few drinks more than once, something I daresay most have also done.

Until I know a hell of a lot about exact drinking patterns, I'm not going to be making any accusations.
 

Richard

Cricket Web Staff Member
A couple more articles related to the book:

Fletcher blasts Botham

Fletcher is a sour hypocrite
It's a shame, really - Boycott is pretty much right in what he says about the media. It's not there to be nice. Well, I'd like it TBH if it was. I'd like it if the media and those in the cricket team worked together to the maximum extent possible.

As it is, I don't see how you can expect someone like Duncan Fletcher to accept the media for being what they are then just forgive them everything, and be open and warm to them. If someone's a &%$£ to you, frankly, you've got no obligation to do anything but return the favour.
 

vic_orthdox

Global Moderator
Richard said:
I'd like it if the media and those in the cricket team worked together to the maximum extent possible.
I'd also like it if the media and the govermnent worked to the maximum extent possible.
 

vic_orthdox

Global Moderator
Richard said:
As it is, I don't see how you can expect someone like Duncan Fletcher to accept the media for being what they are then just forgive them everything, and be open and warm to them. If someone's a &%$£ to you, frankly, you've got no obligation to do anything but return the favour.
I'd say that the counter-argument towards that is that the accusation towards Fletcher, from what I can see, is not that he was prickly towards a certain journalist or two, but that he was prickly throughout whole news conferences on regular occassions. You're representing the mood of the team in front of those press conferences, you need to show - not just to the press, but far more importantly to the consumers of the media - that there's a positivity flowing through the group. Fletcher didn't convey that.
 

vic_orthdox

Global Moderator
Not everyone is Frank Packer and Rupert Murdoch y'know.
??

The idea of government and the media working together is repulsive. Similarly, the sports press are there to hold accountable decisions made by those in positions of sporting power, in which people have a vested interest in.
 

Richard

Cricket Web Staff Member
I'd say that the counter-argument towards that is that the accusation towards Fletcher, from what I can see, is not that he was prickly towards a certain journalist or two, but that he was prickly throughout whole news conferences on regular occassions. You're representing the mood of the team in front of those press conferences, you need to show - not just to the press, but far more importantly to the consumers of the media - that there's a positivity flowing through the group. Fletcher didn't convey that.
What some might interpret as "prickly" I'd merely interpret as "noncommittal". He tried to remain as neutral as possible; he knew the media had the potential for huge backstabbing, interpreting things in their own way totally different to how they're meant, and many other things. So he tried to minimise that.

Sadly, there's really no winning with the media - there will always be those who criticise, and it's not remotely possible to give them nothing to criticise. If you try to be noncommittal, thus minimising this and that, people will say you should be showing more charisma and positivity.

If people take against this and write a load of crap about how bad you are, I don't see why you should then show any inclination to speak to them ever again.
 

Top