Sanz said:
Its hard to believe you when you post something like
THIS.
Oh, come on. Even the blooming president of Pakistan YESTERDAY said that little had been done in the past to combat the problems - for many years Pakistan has, for one reason or another, been visualised as a safe haven for terrorists (more especially from Afghanistan in the early 1980's).
So much in this world is down to perception - that of being seen to be right - and that is why Musharraf announced that the first step is to ban foreigners from the madrassas. It's been suggested that more than one of the first wave of British suicide bombers had spent some time at one, some of which are Saudi-financed. That's not to say that they aren't places of religious study and to be applauded as such, but putting a lot of impressionable youngsters in one place can lead to exploitation on some occasions, especially if one or two have the political motivation and wish to exploit the situation.
Much of that is down to the physical geography of the place and the sheer enormity of trying to clear factions out of isolated areas. I never said that they weren't trying their hardest now, as Musharraf's statement reveals....
''Maybe the boat would have capsized" (if his government had pursued domestic militants more aggressively in 2002, he said.) ''We took action, but there were restraining factors."
.
Now if the country's blooming PRESIDENT admits that they hadn't done enough (and I was really referring to the Gen Zia era after the execution of Bhutto), then we can take it as read that they hadn't done enough.
If the reference to Abu Ala al-Maudoodi was too hard for you, he was (reputed to be) the person who was, let's say, the 'inspiration' of Osama Bin Laden.
I've just wasted another 20 minutes on you, haven't I? Banged my head against a brick wall.