Flem274*
123/5
Haha.Should be at 1!![]()
That was such an awesome innings, best I've seen in my life, and to think its only at number 10, wish I'd seen the ones above it.
Haha.Should be at 1!![]()
It's almost like they've been playing test cricket for 100 years before you were born or something...Haha.
That was such an awesome innings, best I've seen in my life, and to think its only at number 10, wish I'd seen the ones above it.
Second innings of this match.Give me the link to a Harvey half-century masterpiece, and I will rate it for you.
Harvey's 2nd innings 69 while all fell around him in Laker's Test is also considered one of his finest efforts of batsmanship.Give me the link to a Harvey half-century masterpiece, and I will rate it for you.
Second innings of this match.
2nd Test: Australia v England at Sydney, 17-22 Dec 1954
Probably worth rating May's ton as well while you're at it.
Harvey's 2nd innings 69 while all fell around him in Laker's Test is also considered one of his finest efforts of batsmanship.
3rd TEST: England v Australia at Leeds, 12-17 Jul 1956
MeCricinfo - 1st Test: Pakistan v Australia at Dhaka, Nov 13-18, 1959
Here - 96 in Australia's first innings, when only one other player got above 20 in that innings.
Whenever I just look at things like this and can momentarily forget every word he's said about the game since 1963, so do I...MeNeil Harvey.
Second innings of this match.
2nd Test: Australia v England at Sydney, 17-22 Dec 1954
Probably worth rating May's ton as well while you're at it.
Harvey's 2nd innings 69 while all fell around him in Laker's Test is also considered one of his finest efforts of batsmanship.
3rd TEST: England v Australia at Leeds, 12-17 Jul 1956
honestly gavaskar's 236*, at no.11, is the one of the most useless knocks i've ever seen.
Cricinfo - 1st Test: Pakistan v Australia at Dhaka, Nov 13-18, 1959
Here - 96 in Australia's first innings, when only one other player got above 20 in that innings.
Gilly's maiden ton gets 705 pointsAlso, did you put Gilchrist's maiden test ton into the formula?
Minor point also- isn't being 200+ behind going into the third innings essentially identical to following on?
that match and his knock in particular had the word "DRAW" written on them in bold letters all the time. after winning the series 3-0 Windies were happy to take it easy once the first day's play was washed out. it was a essentially a four day test. when the west indies finished at 300 something, not big enough to push for a win or not too bad a score from where they could lose to a mediocre indian attack, they were not interested in the match that much. the indian innings was jolted by marshall's opening spell but gavaskar and shastri set shop and put everyone, including west indies fielders, to sleep. the only interest in the match was sunny breaking bradman's record no of centuries.Can you please explain?
I found it funny that for once Gavaskar put himself at no.4, but he came in at 0/2 so he opened the fricken innings anyway.![]()