Blocky
Banned
That was the "Trolling/Baiting" infraction I received; as I pointed out in an email to James, it's not exactly a controversial opinion.If you were infracted for that Jimmy post then that is rough. I love Jimmy but he clearly would be the worst seamer to 500. Not exactly an insult.
The ***ual Harassment one: Laura Guptill, I'll take that on the chin, I personally don't differentiate her from any other public personality and don't really consider it different to say the "Taylor Swift is a slut" mantra that you see on the internet but that's fine, that's not how the mods see it, I won't post about her.
The repetitive posting one; taken out of context if you see someone posting about events in a cricket match as they occur and you come back to them 12 hours later, it might look repetitive, but in that case, state that threads aren't for "live" reaction to the game. In this case I was talking about the English vs India test when the ball started shooting through the surface and caused three wickets in short order, apparently that's repetitive posting.
Moderators wouldn't have such a hard job if they actually followed their T&C, didn't play favoritism (imagine the response if I posted what ***** posts about me) and were consistent in how they infracted people.
Last edited: