I'll second this.I'm thinking maybe Watson in for Hammond though
Haha.There is no need for that.Get Hammond in place of Jessop and start this before someone nominates another player.that's it i'm extending to 64
If not Jessop then either Streak or Akram.But some people love Jessop
and like I said earlier we're including FC stats
Good bowling all-rounders average more with the bat than with the bowl.So Streak (22 bat,28 bowl) cannot be considered one of them.But I love Streak and Akram, they were good batsmen. would prefer both over Watson
Streak's ODI batting average is deceptive helped by high percentage of not outs.(55 in 159) .Watson is one of the best ODI all-rounders of the last 10-12 years.yeah but his ODI stats are a lot better as are Watson's
and Streak's bowling average is deceptive IMO, as often stated here he had to carry the entire pace attack on his own shoulders
hey those mofos couldn't get him out not his problem. anyway it doesnt matter we're doing 64 and we're nearly there anyway. Maybe Streak will run into Watson round 1 and then we will truely see WHATS UPStreak's ODI batting average is deceptive helped by high percentage of not outs.(55 in 159) .Watson is one of the best ODI all-rounders of the last 10-12 years.