FaaipDeOiad
Hall of Fame Member
Hard to pick between several quicks for the last spot. McGrath, Marshall, Holding, Lillee and Trueman all make a good case, as do some others.
I'll go for Lillee.
I'll go for Lillee.
I think he is a great bowler, but there are a lot better bowlers than Hadlee. He just played in a weakened team where he was expected to get the most wickets and probably bowled more overs than most bowlers than.Jono said:Marshall. He could bat too, and as I said, we now have a team that can bat till 11. That's just dominant
Hadlee was a champion bowler, possibly one of the 5 best ever. He shouldn't be punished just because he can bat. He's not been selected because of his batting ability, that's an extra. Champion bowlers don't have to be bunnies with the bat ala Ambrose or McGrath.
Blaze said:J Hobbs
S Gavaskar
D Bradman
S Tendulkar
B Lara
G Sobers
A Gilchrist
I Khan
R Hadlee
S Warne
?
Warne takes it - 12 votes to Marshall's 10.
Voting for 11 ends in 24 hours.