• Welcome to the Cricket Web forums, one of the biggest forums in the world dedicated to cricket.

    You are currently viewing our boards as a guest which gives you limited access to view most discussions and access our other features. By joining our free community you will have access to post topics, respond to polls, upload content and access many other special features. Registration is fast, simple and absolutely free so please, join the Cricket Web community today!

    If you have any problems with the registration process or your account login, please contact us.

Brett Lee's final Test wicket tally

How many Test wickets will Brett Lee finish with?


  • Total voters
    83
Bit unlucky in his career, had he played for any other team he would have been their first pick bowler. A weak bowling team like England or India could have benifitted from a bowler like Lee but unfortunately for Lee he had too many other good bowlers to fight for positions with. He is one of the best true fast bowlers from the 00"s.
 

Top_Cat

Request Your Custom Title Now!
Bit unlucky in his career, had he played for any other team he would have been their first pick bowler. A weak bowling team like England or India could have benifitted from a bowler like Lee but unfortunately for Lee he had too many other good bowlers to fight for positions with. He is one of the best true fast bowlers from the 00"s.
Haha, what? Was carried from '01-'05 despite bowling pap for much of the period. The success of the better bowlers, if anything, masked his poor form because the side was winning. Any of Kasper/Bichel/Clark/Noffke/Bracken had cases to be picked over Lee at various times in that period. Was a member of the platinum selection club for sure.

The worst bowler to get past 300 Test wickets for mine.
 
Last edited:

Craig

World Traveller
I would find it very hard to believe that Lee wouldn't of been one of the first bowlers on the team sheet if he played for New Zealand, provided he didn't catch the injury curse. I think that is what Streetwise was getting at.

I mean:

Bond
Lee
Martin

Plus you would of had O'Brien, Oram, Mills, and Tuffey to throw into the mix. Then Vettori being an auto selection (whether TH likes it or not), I have seen worse bowling line ups. I'm also without doubt he would of got an England cap.
 
I would find it very hard to believe that Lee wouldn't of been one of the first bowlers on the team sheet if he played for New Zealand, provided he didn't catch the injury curse. I think that is what Streetwise was getting at.

I mean:

Bond
Lee
Martin

Plus you would of had O'Brien, Oram, Mills, and Tuffey to throw into the mix. Then Vettori being an auto selection (whether TH likes it or not), I have seen worse bowling line ups. I'm also without doubt he would of got an England cap.
Not just NZ, this would apply to Eng, Ind, SL, WI, Pak and SA.
 

G.I.Joe

International Coach
If you're a quick averaging pretty close to a spinner, its pretty obvious you're worse off than him.
 

Matt79

Hall of Fame Member
Not taking away from the bloke. I'll write a proper post on him when a official announcement thread pops up. I just take issue with the idea he'll figure
in the ODI team again.
 

pasag

RTDAS
It's a sad way for him to go out, he was so fit throughout his career that he deserved for this not to happen to him and it would have been nice or him to have a proper goodbye. I'll miss him.
 

Nate

You'll Never Walk Alone
Love Binga. No idea what Matt is talking about ftr, can still see him playing at least 20/20s for a bit yet.
 

Richard

Cricket Web Staff Member
Five players with 300 wickets that are not as good as Lee.

Vass
Willis
Vettori
Harbijan
Ntini
You know, I did wonder whether you actually believe the Australian>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>anything-else crap you type, but the notion that Lee was a better Test bowler than Bob Willis pretty much confirms all you're trying to do is deliberately post inflammatory claptrap.

The notion that Lee was better than Ntini, BTW, isn't completely stupid, just fairly so. The idea that he was better than Vaas is nonsensical.
 

Richard

Cricket Web Staff Member
His limitations lay more with his intellect ("hey, one more bouncer couldn't hurt!") than with his skill with the ball. He had almost everything - express pace, decent seam movement, reverse swing, just enough outswing, inswing, cutters, a slower ball and a deadly yorker and bouncer when he used them properly.
From what I've always understood, at least some of that had to do with mishandling from that supposedly oh so great captain Stephen Waugh. Most who watched him closely observed him to be a partially flawed tactician and his advice to Lee to keep bowling poorly rather than trying to bowl well certainly seem to have had some impact.

Of course that isn't to entirely excuse Lee - a bowler has his own mind and if he realises his captain's advice is hindering him he can tell him "sorry mate, I'm the bowler, I'll decide how I bowl". But it's a decent question what might've happened had Lee played under a better captain like Mark Taylor.
 

Top