James
Cricket Web Owner
Oh ok - we can still hope then can't webarmyarmy said:Something simular was in the BLIC shots. When we asked RG about it he said that AI is the last thing to be tweaked so screenshots often have unrealistic scores.
Oh ok - we can still hope then can't webarmyarmy said:Something simular was in the BLIC shots. When we asked RG about it he said that AI is the last thing to be tweaked so screenshots often have unrealistic scores.
And he has a towel in his back pocket...Mr Casson said:That bowling action looks awful as ever.
Check out the fact of the day thing that's on CW. As far as 'facts and information' go, that looks extremely impressive and very comprehensive.the_axe said:mate....how can u judge gameplay when u haven't even played the game.
The gameplay of cricket2004 had potential, there is no reason to expect the gameplay for cricket 2005 to be just as bad.
As i have said before...cricket 99 to 2002 were extremely bad cricket games. But cricket 2004 was actually quite good and had a lot of potential (its been said it many other forums as well)....other than a few bugs and the fact it was talked up were the reasons ppl were disappointed. I still enjoy playing cricket2004 expecially with the patches available and i love playing the foriegn tours and playing county and australian state cricket, which won't be available in blc2005.
.
There is more information and facts to back cricket 2005 will be great - you can't say that about BLC2005, other than the fact they brought out a cricket game close to 10 years ago that was only just a little improvement to what ea were producing back then as well - no ground-breaking stuff at all.
I think we have to accept that cricket games are hard to develop and to be made fun to play and i think it will take many more years for a lot of u blokes to become satisfied.
Axe
You haven't seen Cricket 2005 yet, so what 'facts' are you talking about?the_axe said:mate i'm talking about real facts...remember ea released information about cricket 2004 which sounded good but didn't deliver, they can say what they like but there not true facts....we r just going to have wait and see but i'm sick of ppl playing down cricket 2005.I'm aware of everything that has been released by both developers...i've visited many forums.
exactly the same thing i was thinking when i bought 2004, but still today i play cricket 2002.Dydl said:I'm still buying Cricket 2005. Anything that can be better than Cricket 2004...
are you actually hinting that Pro evo is better than FiFa, give me a break.........Shoaib said:.Konami have been defeating EA continously for 4 years in the sale of soccer games by just concentrating on good gameplay..